A review of strategies for validating computer-automated scoring

被引：58

作者：

Yang, YW

Buckendahl, CW

Juszkiewicz, PJ

Bhola, DS

机构：

[1] Gallup Org Inc, Lincoln, NE 68510 USA

[2] Univ Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA

来源：

APPLIED MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION | 2002年 / 15卷 / 04期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1207/S15324818AME1504_04

中图分类号：

G40 [教育学];

学科分类号：

040101 ; 120403 ;

摘要：

Computer-automated scoring (CAS) is becoming a popular tool in assessment. Various studies have been conducted to assess the quality of CAS-system-generated scores. There is then a need for a systematic examination of these studies in the context of contemporary validity concepts and current practice. This article starts with a brief introduction to current CAS systems. Next, we review the current practice of validating CAS-system-generated scores. Finally, we present a conceptual framework and general recommendations for designing validation studies for CAS procedures.

引用

页码：391 / 412

页数：22

共 46 条

[1]

American Educational Research Association. American Psychological Association & N. C. on M. in E., 1999, STAND ED PSYCH TEST

[2] EVOLVING CONCEPTS OF TEST VALIDATION .7. [J].

ANASTASI, A .

ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 37 :1-15

[3]

[Anonymous], MACHINE MEDIATED LEA

[4]

[Anonymous], CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT

[5]

[Anonymous], P ANN M ASS COMP LIN

[6]

*ASS TEST PUBL, 2002, GUID COMP BAS TEST

[7]

BEJAR II, 1991, J APPL PSYCHOL, V76, P522

[8] The accuracy of expert-system diagnoses of mathematical problem solutions [J].

Bennett, RE ;

Sebrechts, MM .

APPLIED MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, 1996, 9 (02) :133-150

[9]

BENNETT RE, 1998, ED MEASUREMENT ISSUE, P9

[10] SCORING CONSTRUCTED RESPONSES USING EXPERT SYSTEMS [J].

BRAUN, HI ;

BENNETT, RE ;

FRYE, D ;

SOLOWAY, E .

JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 1990, 27 (02) :93-108

← 1 2 3 4 5 →