On the mechanism of wing size determination in fly development

被引:305
作者
Hufnagel, Lars
Teleman, Aurelio A.
Rouault, Herve
Cohen, Stephen M.
Shraiman, Boris I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Kavli Inst Theoret Phys, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[2] European Mol Biol Lab, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Ecole Normale Super, Lab Phys Stat, F-75231 Paris 5, France
关键词
growth regulation; imaginal disc; mechanics;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.0607134104
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A fundamental and unresolved problem in animal development is the question of how a growing tissue knows when it has achieved its correct final size. A widely held view suggests that this process is controlled by morphogen gradients, which adapt to tissue size and become flatter as tissue grows, leading eventually to growth arrest. Here, we present evidence that the decapentaplegic (Dpp) morphogen distribution in the developing Drosophila wing imaginal disk does not adapt to disk size. We measure the distribution of a functional Dpp-GFP transgene and the Dpp signal transduced by phospho-Mad and show that the characteristic length scale of the Dpp profile remains approximately constant during growth. This finding suggests an alternative scenario of size determination, where disk size is determined relative to the fixed morphogen distribution by a certain threshold level of morphogen required for growth. We propose that when disk boundary reaches the threshold the arrest of cell proliferation throughout the disk is induced by mechanical stress in the tissue. Mechanical stress is expected to arise from the nonuniformity of morphogen distribution that drives growth. This stress, through a negative feedback on growth, can compensate for the nonuniformity of morphogen, achieving uniform growth with the rate that vanishes when disk boundary reaches the threshold. The mechanism is demonstrated through computer simulations of a tissue growth model that identifies the key assumptions and testable predictions. This analysis provides an alternative hypothesis for the size determination process. Novel experimental approaches will be needed to test this model.
引用
收藏
页码:3835 / 3840
页数:6
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   The interpretation of morphogen gradients [J].
Ashe, HL ;
Briscoe, J .
DEVELOPMENT, 2006, 133 (03) :385-394
[2]   Drosophila Dpp morphogen movement is independent of dynamin-mediated endocytosis but regulated by the glypican members of heparan sulfate proteoglycans [J].
Belenkaya, TY ;
Han, C ;
Yan, D ;
Opoka, RJ ;
Khodoun, M ;
Liu, HZ ;
Lin, XH .
CELL, 2004, 119 (02) :231-244
[3]   Epithelial polarity and proliferation control:: links from the Drosophila neoplastic tumor suppressors [J].
Bilder, D .
GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 18 (16) :1909-1925
[4]   Cooperative regulation of cell polarity and growth by Drosophila tumor suppressors [J].
Bilder, D ;
Li, M ;
Perrimon, N .
SCIENCE, 2000, 289 (5476) :113-116
[5]  
BOEDIGHEIMER M, 1993, DEVELOPMENT, V118, P1291
[6]   INTRINSIC AND EXTRINSIC CONTROL OF GROWTH IN DEVELOPING ORGANS [J].
BRYANT, PJ ;
SIMPSON, P .
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, 1984, 59 (04) :387-415
[7]  
Burke R, 1996, DEVELOPMENT, V122, P2261
[8]   Hox control of organ size by regulation of morphogen production and mobility [J].
Crickmore, Michael A. ;
Mann, Richard S. .
SCIENCE, 2006, 313 (5783) :63-68
[9]  
Day SJ, 2000, DEVELOPMENT, V127, P2977
[10]   Self-enhanced ligand degradation underlies robustness of morphogen gradients [J].
Eldar, A ;
Rosin, D ;
Shilo, BZ ;
Barkai, N .
DEVELOPMENTAL CELL, 2003, 5 (04) :635-646