Socioeconomic and sex differentials in reason for sickness absence from the Whitehall II study

被引:136
作者
Feeney, A
North, F
Head, J
Canner, R
Marmot, M
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, London WC1E 6EA, England
[2] Univ Otago, Dept Social & Prevent Med, Dunedin, New Zealand
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
sickness absence; sex differences; socioeconomic status;
D O I
10.1136/oem.55.2.91
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives-Large socioeconomic differences exist in disease and mortality. This paper describes the distribution of specific medical reasons for sickness absence by grade of employment in the Whitehall II study and validates the medical reason by comparison with general practitioners' records. Methods-Analysis of sickness absence data on 5620 male and female civil servants aged 35-55 years. Data have been collected from 12 of the 20 London based civil service departments participating in the Whitehall II study, where medical reason for absence was available. Rates and distributions of reasons for absence for short spells (less than or equal to 7 days) and long spells (>7 days) were analysed. Results-Respiratory disorders and gastroenteritis accounted for over half of all spells of absence, with headache and migraine, musculoskeletal disorders, injury, and neurosis accounting for a further 20%-30% of absences. There was an inverse association with employment grade, the lower the grade the higher the rate of absence for both short spells (less than or equal to 7 days) and long spells (>7 days). In general, women had higher rates of absence than men. Comparison of reason for very long spells of absence (>21 days) showed moderate agreement between civil service and general practitioner. Conclusion-There is a lack of national comprehensive data on sickness absence and medical reason for absence, in particular for women and for spells of different duration. Data from the Whitehall II study show large employment grade and sex differences in the distribution of medical reasons for absence that are similar to socioeconomic differences in morbidity documented in other studies. Possible explanations include the subjective nature of illness and disease; the work/family interface; and the influence of the absence culture. Longer term follow up will provide information on whether sickness absence relates to serious morbidity and mortality.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 98
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
ALDERSON MR, 1967, BRIT J PREV SOC MED, V21, P1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1986, MORB STAT GEN PRACT
[3]  
BALCOMBE J, 1993, WISH YOU WERE HERE U
[4]  
BOURBONNAIS R, 1992, BRIT J IND MED, V49, P673
[5]  
CHEVALIER A, 1987, BRIT J IND MED, V44, P101
[6]  
*CONF BRIT IND, 1997, MAN ABS SICKN HLTH
[7]  
Cox B. D., 1987, HLTH LIFESTYLE SURVE
[8]  
GOODWIN R, 1993, TRENDS SICKNESS INVA, P1
[9]  
Haldorsen EMH, 1996, SCAND J RHEUMATOL, V25, P224
[10]   INCREASED ABSENTEEISM FROM WORK AFTER DETECTION AND LABELING OF HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS [J].
HAYNES, RB ;
SACKETT, DL ;
TAYLOR, DW ;
GIBSON, ES ;
JOHNSON, AL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1978, 299 (14) :741-744