Comparative evaluation of FUNGITEST and broth microdilution methods for antifungal drug susceptibility testing of Candida species and Cryptococcus neoformans

被引:43
作者
Davey, KG [1 ]
Holmes, AD [1 ]
Johnson, EM [1 ]
Szekely, A [1 ]
Warnock, DW [1 ]
机构
[1] Publ Hlth Lab Serv, Mycol Reference Lab, Bristol, Avon, England
关键词
D O I
10.1128/JCM.36.4.926-930.1998
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The FUNGITEST method (Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur, Paris, France) is a microplate-based procedure for the breakpoint testing of six antifungal agents (amphotericin B, flucytosine, fluconazole, itraconazole, ketoconazole, and miconazole). We compared the FUNGITEST method with a broth microdilution test, performed according to National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards document M27-A guidelines, for determining the in vitro susceptibilities of 180 isolates of Candida spp, (50 C. albicans, 50 C. glabrata, 10 C. kefyr, 20 C. krusei, 10 C. lusitaniae, 20 C. parapsilosis, and 20 C. tropicalis isolates) and 20 isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans. Overall, there was 100% agreement between the methods for amphotericin B, 95% agreement for flucytosine, 84% agreement for miconazole, 83% agreement for itraconazole, 77% agreement for ketoconazole, and 76% agreement for fluconazole, The overall agreement between the methods exceeded 80% for all species tested with the exception of C. glabrata (71% agreement), The poorest agreement between the results for individual agents was seen with C. glabrata (38% for fluconazole, 44% for ketoconazole, and 56% for itraconazole) and C. tropicalis (50% for miconazole), The FUNGITEST method misclassified as susceptible 2 of 12 (16.6%) fluconazole-resistant isolates, 2 of 10 (20%) itraconazole-resistant isolates, and 4 of 8 (50%) ketoconazole-resistant isolates of several Candida spp, Further development of the FUNGITEST procedure will be required before it can be recommended as an alternative method for the susceptibility testing of Candida spp, or C, neoformans.
引用
收藏
页码:926 / 930
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF BROTH MACRODILUTION AND MICRODILUTION TECHNIQUES FOR IN-VITRO ANTIFUNGAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING OF YEASTS BY USING THE NATIONAL-COMMITTEE-FOR-CLINICAL-LABORATORY-STANDARDS PROPOSED STANDARD
    BARCHIESI, F
    COLOMBO, AL
    MCGOUGH, DA
    RINALDI, MG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 32 (10) : 2494 - 2500
  • [2] DRATZ DJ, 1978, AM J MED SCI, V276, P77
  • [3] COLLABORATIVE COMPARISON OF BROTH MACRODILUTION AND MICRODILUTION ANTIFUNGAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTS
    ESPINELINGROFF, A
    KISH, CW
    KERKERING, TM
    FROMTLING, RA
    BARTIZAL, K
    GALGIANI, JN
    VILLAREAL, K
    PFALLER, MA
    GERARDEN, T
    RINALDI, MG
    FOTHERGILL, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1992, 30 (12) : 3138 - 3145
  • [4] COMPARISON STUDY OF BROTH MACRODILUTION AND MICRODILUTION ANTIFUNGAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTS
    ESPINELINGROFF, A
    KERKERING, TM
    GOLDSON, PR
    SHADOMY, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1991, 29 (06) : 1089 - 1094
  • [5] Susceptibility testing of fungi: Current status of correlation of in vitro data with clinical outcome
    Ghannoum, MA
    Rex, JH
    Galgiani, JN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1996, 34 (03) : 489 - 495
  • [6] Lot-to-lot variability of antibiotic medium 3 used for testing susceptibility of Candida isolates to amphotericin B
    LozanoChiu, M
    Nelson, PW
    Lancaster, M
    Pfaller, MA
    Rex, JH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1997, 35 (01) : 270 - 272
  • [7] MALAIT D, COMMUNICATION
  • [8] MERZ WG, 1979, J CLIN MICROBIOL, V9, P677
  • [9] National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, 1997, M27A NAT COMM CLIN L
  • [10] DEVELOPMENT OF RESISTANCE TO AMPHOTERICIN-B IN CANDIDA-LUSITANIAE INFECTING A HUMAN
    PAPPAGIANIS, D
    COLLINS, MS
    HECTOR, R
    REMINGTON, J
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1979, 16 (02) : 123 - 126