Preferred changes in power differences: Effects of social comparison in equal and unequal power relations

被引:19
作者
van Dijke, M [1 ]
Poppe, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Tilburg Univ, Dept Psychol, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
social comparison; power; power change; hierarchy; power distance;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00524-3
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Efforts to change power differences with others who are equal and unequal in power were examined. According to social comparison theory (Festinger, 1954; Rijsman, 1983), people prefer slight superiority in power over comparison others. In Experiment 1, 93 participants imagined working with two others in a group. Group members varied in hierarchical rank and on exact power scores. Participants indicated their preferred changes in power differences. Social comparison theory was supported regarding rank differences, but not regarding power scores. In Experiment 2, 145 participants imagined a similar group setting. Group members were equal, unequal, or very unequal in power. Social comparison theory was supported regarding ranks: power differences with an equally powerful person were increased more often than with a less powerful per-son. Power scores again yielded no effects. This suggests that social comparisons of power are based on rank and not interval information. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 160
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
ADAMS JS, 1965, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V2, P267
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1985, HDB SOCIAL PSYCHOL
[3]  
[Anonymous], COALITION FORMATION
[4]  
Bargh, 2001, USE ABUSE POWER MULT, P181
[5]  
Brewer Marilynn., 1998, HDB SOCIAL PSYCHOL, P554
[6]   COGNITIONS AND BEHAVIOR IN A HIERARCHY - MULDERS POWER THEORY REVISITED [J].
BRUINS, JJ ;
WILKE, HAM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 22 (01) :21-39
[7]   UPWARD POWER TENDENCIES IN A HIERARCHY - POWER DISTANCE THEORY VERSUS BUREAUCRATIC RULE [J].
BRUINS, JJ ;
WILKE, HAM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 23 (03) :239-254
[8]   THE SOCIAL-COMPARISON OF ABILITY [J].
DAKIN, S ;
ARROWOOD, AJ .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 1981, 34 (02) :89-109
[9]  
DEPRET M, 1993, CONTROL MOTIVATION S, P176
[10]   POWER-DEPENDENCE RELATIONS [J].
EMERSON, RM .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1962, 27 (01) :31-41