Impact of surgical staging in evaluating the radiotherapeutic outcome in RTOG #77-06, a phase III study for T1BN0M0 (A2) and T2N0M0 (B) prostate carcinoma

被引:59
作者
Asbell, SO
Martz, KL
Shin, KH
Sause, WT
Doggett, RL
Perez, CA
Pilepich, MV
机构
[1] Albert Einstein Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19141 USA
[2] RTOG Stat Ctr, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] New York State Dept Hlth, Roswell Pk Mem Inst, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
[4] LDS Hosp, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[5] Sutter Hosp, Sacramento, CA USA
[6] Washington Univ, Sch Med, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[7] Catherine McAuley Hlth Ctr, Ann Arbor, MI USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 1998年 / 40卷 / 04期
关键词
prostate cancer; radiation therapy; surgical staging; lymphangiogram; staging lymphadenectomy;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(97)00926-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate survival and time to metastatic disease in patients treated for localized prostatic carcinoma in a Phase III radiotherapy (RT) protocol, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 77-06, Patients with T18NOMO (A2) or T2NOMO (B) disease after lymphangiogram (LAG) or staging laparotomy (SL) were randomized between prophylactic radiation to the pelvic lymph nodes and prostatic bed vs, prostatic bed alone, The outcome of both treatment arms, as well as a comparison of the LAG group, to that of the SL group, are updated, Methods and Materials: A total of 449 eligible males were entered into RTOG protocol 7706 between 1978 and 1983, Lymph node staging was mandatory but at the physician's discretion; 117 (26%) patients had SL, while 332 (74%) had LAG, Follow-up was a median of 12 years and a maximum of 16 years, For those randomized to receive prophylactic pelvic lymph nodal irradiation, 45 Gy of megavoltage RT was delivered via multiple portals in 4.5-5 weeks, while all patients received 65 Gy in 6.5-8 weeks to the prostatic bed, Results: There was no significant difference in survival whether treatment was administered to the prostate or prostate and pelvic lymph nodes, The SL group had greater 12-year survival than the LAG group (48% vs, 38%, p = 0.02), Disease-free survival was statistically significant, with 38% for the SL group vs, 26% for the LAG group (p = 0.003), Bone metastasis was less common in the SL group (14%) than the LAG group (27%) (p = 0.003), Conclusion: At 12-year median follow-up, there still was no survival difference in those patients treated prophylactically to the pelvic nodes and prostatic bed vs, the prostatic bed alone, Those patients not surgically staged with only LAG for lymph node evaluation were less accurately staged, as reflected by a statistically significant reduced survival and earlier metastases. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:769 / 782
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ELECTIVE PELVIC IRRADIATION IN STAGE A2, B CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE - ANALYSIS OF RTOG-77-06
    ASBELL, SO
    KRALL, JM
    PILEPICH, MV
    BAERWALD, H
    SAUSE, WT
    HANKS, GE
    PEREZ, CA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1988, 15 (06): : 1307 - 1316
  • [2] IMPACT OF SURGICAL STAGING IN EVALUATING THE RADIOTHERAPEUTIC OUTCOME IN RTOG PHASE-III STUDY FOR A2-PROSTATE AND B-PROSTATE CARCINOMA
    ASBELL, SO
    MARTZ, KL
    PILEPICH, MV
    BAERWALD, HH
    SAUSE, WT
    DOGGETT, RL
    PEREZ, CA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1989, 17 (05): : 945 - 951
  • [3] BAGSHAW MA, 1985, UROLOGY, V25, P17
  • [4] USE OF ENDORECTAL SURFACE COIL MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING FOR LOCAL STAGING OF PROSTATE-CANCER
    CHELSKY, MJ
    SCHNALL, MD
    SEIDMON, EJ
    POLLACK, HM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 150 (02) : 391 - 395
  • [5] STAGING PROSTATIC-CANCER - REVIEW
    CLEMENTS, R
    GRIFFITHS, GJ
    PEELING, WB
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1992, 46 (04) : 225 - 231
  • [6] A METHOD FOR DETERMINING A PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN CURE AFTER RADIATION-THERAPY FOR CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER
    DAMICO, AV
    WHITTINGTON, R
    MALKOWICZ, SB
    SCHULTZ, D
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 32 (02): : 473 - 477
  • [7] PELVIC LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION - GUIDE TO PATIENT-MANAGEMENT IN CLINICALLY LOCALLY CONFINED ADENOCARCINOMA OF PROSTATE
    DONOHUE, RE
    MANI, JH
    WHITESEL, JA
    MOHR, S
    SCANAVINO, D
    AUGSPURGER, RR
    BIBER, RJ
    FAUVER, HE
    WETTLAUFER, JN
    PFISTER, RR
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1982, 20 (06) : 559 - 565
  • [8] PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT OF PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA BY COMPUTERIZED-TOMOGRAPHY - WEAKNESSES AND NEW PERSPECTIVES
    ENGELER, CE
    WASSERMAN, NF
    ZHANG, G
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1992, 40 (04) : 346 - 350
  • [9] REFERENCE RANGE FOR PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN LEVELS AFTER EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIATION-THERAPY FOR ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE
    GEIST, RW
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1995, 45 (06) : 1016 - 1021
  • [10] GOTHLIN JH, 1981, RADIOLOGY, V141, P351