SUPERSTAR EXTINCTION

被引:409
作者
Azoulay, Pierre [1 ]
Zivin, Joshua S. Graff [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Jialan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Alfred P Sloan Sch Management, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1162/qjec.2010.125.2.549
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We estimate the magnitude of spillovers generated by 112 academic "super-stars" who died prematurely and unexpectedly, thus providing an exogenous source of variation in the structure of their collaborators' coauthorship networks. Following the death of a superstar, we find that collaborators experience, on average, a lasting 5% to 8% decline in their quality-adjusted publication rates. By exploring interactions of the treatment effect with a variety of star, coauthor, and star/coauthor dyad characteristics, we seek to adjudicate between plausible mechanisms that might explain this finding. Taken together, our results suggest that spillovers are circumscribed in idea space, but less so in physical or social space. In particular, superstar extinction reveals the boundaries of the scientific field to which the star contributes-the "invisible college."
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 589
页数:41
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Restructuring Research: Communication Costs and the Democratization of University Innovation
    Agrawal, Ajay
    Goldfarb, Avi
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 98 (04) : 1578 - 1590
  • [2] Aizenman J, 2008, 13891 NBER
  • [3] [Anonymous], 13338 NBER
  • [4] [Anonymous], SOURCES IND LEADERSH
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2005, 11172 NBER
  • [6] [Anonymous], 15466 NBER
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1972, Invisible colleges: diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities
  • [8] Azoulay P., 2009, SOCIAL INFLUENCE GIV
  • [9] Social preferences and the response to incentives: Evidence from personnel data
    Bandiera, O
    Barankay, I
    Rasul, I
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2005, 120 (03) : 917 - 962
  • [10] Bennedsen M., 2008, DO CEOS MATTER