Functional clustering: Identifying strongly interactive brain regions in neuroimaging data

被引:179
作者
Tononi, G
McIntosh, AR
Russell, DP
Edelman, GM
机构
[1] Inst Neurosci, San Diego, CA 92121 USA
[2] Baycrest Ctr Geriatr Care, Rotman Res Inst, Toronto, ON M6A 2E1, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1006/nimg.1997.0313
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Brain imaging data are generally used to determine which brain regions are most active in an experimental paradigm or in a group of subjects. Theoretical considerations suggest that it would also be of interest to know which set of brain regions are most interactive in a given task or group of subjects. A subset of regions that are much more strongly interactive among themselves than with the rest of the brain is called here a functional cluster. Functional clustering can be assessed by calculating for each subset of brain regions a measure, the cluster index, obtained by dividing the statistical dependence within the subset by that between the subset and rest of the brain. A cluster index value near 1 indicates a homogeneous system, while a high cluster index indicates that a subset of brain regions forms a distinct functional cluster. Within a functional cluster, individual brain regions are ranked at the center or at the periphery according to their statistical dependence with the rest of that cluster. The applicability of this approach has been tested on PET data obtained from normal and schizophrenic subjects performing a set of cognitive tasks. Analysis of the data reveals evidence of functional clustering. A comparative evaluation of which regions are more peripheral or more central suggests distinct differences between the two groups of subjects. We consider the applicability of this analysis to data obtained with imaging modalities offering higher temporal resolution than PET. (C) 1998 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 149
页数:17
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1981, ANAL TYPOLOGIQUE THE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Clustering and Classification
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Clustering and classification
[4]  
Bleuler E., 1911, DEMENTIA PRAECOX GRO
[5]  
Blumenthal A., 1977, The Process of Cognition
[6]  
BUDINGER TF, 1992, J NEURAL TRANSM-GEN, P3
[7]  
CHANG WC, 1983, J ROY STAT SOC C, V32, P267
[8]   REVIEW OF CLASSIFICATION [J].
CORMACK, RM .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-GENERAL, 1971, 134 :321-+
[9]  
Cox T. F., 1994, MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCA
[10]  
Edelman G., 1987, NEURAL DARWINISM THE