Comparison of methods to estimate occluded and resistant soil phosphorus

被引:12
作者
Bowman, RA
Rodriguez, JB
Self, JR
机构
[1] ARS, USDA, Akron, CO 80720 USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, Soil Water & Plant Testing Lab, Ft Collins, CO 80524 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2136/sssaj1998.03615995006200020007x
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Weathering, pH changes, and biotic interactions through geologic times have created a gradation of easily released (labile) to strongly stabilized (resistant) P pools, While methodologies for fertility indices and labile P are well established, methods for quantifying less labile P, such as the occluded and resistant or residual P, are less well established. We reexamined existing methods for these pools, and suggested new procedures to improve their precision and timeliness. Specifically we compared two methods for reductant-soluble (occluded) P, and two existing and a nea procedure for the resistant P, Occluded P was different to reproduce from a sequential extraction procedure because of problems associated with molybdate blue reaction, which required extra molybdate or persulfate oxidation to minimize citrate interference. However, use of inductively coupled plasma (ICP) spectroscopy eliminated this problem. Measurement of P by ICP for surface and occluded P in the total free Fe oxide pool was more quantitative and reproducible leverage coefficient of variation (CV) = 5%] than in the sequential extraction (overage CV = 7%) procedure. Results for the proposed resistant P method (total soil P minus acid extractable P in an ignited sample) approximated the two sequential extraction procedures (total soil P - total acid-and base-extractable organic and inorganic P) and is easier, and more reproducible. Both procedures for all soils except the Molokai showed essentially the same amounts of occluded P, An average of about 26% of the total soil P (TP) was resistant, with the more weathered Cecil soil containing about 50% resistant P.
引用
收藏
页码:338 / 342
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
AMER F., 1955, Plant and Soil, V6, P391, DOI 10.1007/BF01343648
[2]  
Barrow N.J., 1980, Role Phosphorus Agric, P333, DOI DOI 10.2134/1980.ROLEOFPHOSPHORUS.C14
[3]   A RAPID METHOD TO DETERMINE TOTAL PHOSPHORUS IN SOILS [J].
BOWMAN, RA .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1988, 52 (05) :1301-1304
[4]  
CHANG S. C., 1957, SOIL SCI, V84, P133, DOI 10.1097/00010694-195708000-00005
[5]  
DUCHAUFOUR P, 1982, PEDOLOGY, P306
[6]   CHANGES IN INORGANIC AND ORGANIC SOIL-PHOSPHORUS FRACTIONS INDUCED BY CULTIVATION PRACTICES AND BY LABORATORY INCUBATIONS [J].
HEDLEY, MJ ;
STEWART, JWB ;
CHAUHAN, BS .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1982, 46 (05) :970-976
[7]   A RAPID CITRATE-DITHIONITE EXTRACTABLE IRON PROCEDURE [J].
HOLMGREN, GG .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA PROCEEDINGS, 1967, 31 (02) :210-&
[8]   Organic amendments and phosphorus dynamics .2. Distribution of soil phosphorus fractions [J].
Iyamuremye, F ;
Dick, RP ;
Baham, J .
SOIL SCIENCE, 1996, 161 (07) :436-443
[9]   LABILE PHOSPHATE IN SOILS [J].
MATTINGLY, GEG .
SOIL SCIENCE, 1975, 119 (05) :369-375
[10]   COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF CYCLING OF ORGANIC C, N, S AND P THROUGH SOIL ORGANIC-MATTER [J].
MCGILL, WB ;
COLE, CV .
GEODERMA, 1981, 26 (04) :267-286