13C NMR and electron ionization mass spectrometric data-activity relationship model of estrogen receptor binding

被引:18
作者
Beger, RD [1 ]
Freeman, JP [1 ]
Lay, JO [1 ]
Wilkes, JG [1 ]
Miller, DW [1 ]
机构
[1] US FDA, Natl Ctr Toxicol Res, Div Chem, Jefferson, AR 72079 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1006/taap.2000.9043
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Two Spectroscopic Data-Activity Relationship (SDAR) models based on C-13 nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and electron ionization mass spectra (EI MS) data were developed for 108 compounds whose relative binding affinities (RBA) to the estrogen receptor are known. The C-13 NMR and EI MS data were used as spectrometric digital fingerprints to reflect the electronic and structural characteristics of the compounds. Both SDAR models segregated the 108 compounds into 20 strong, 15 medium, and 73 weak relative binding classifications. The first SDAR model, based on C-13 NMR data alone, gave a leave-one-out (LOO) cross-validation of 75.0%. The second SDAR model, based on a composite of C-13 NMR and EI MS data, gave a LOO cross-validation of 82.4%. Many of the misidentifications from the cross-validations were between medium and weak classifications, where there were fewer specific spectrometric characteristics to identify the relationship of spectra to estrogen receptor binding. Real and predicted C-13 NMR chemical shifts were used to test the predictive behavior of both SDAR models. The ease of use and speed of SDAR modeling may facilitate their use with other toxicological endpoints.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 25
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
ALTSCHUL SF, 1990, J MOL BIOL, V215, P403, DOI 10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999
[2]  
BEGER R, 2000, IN PRESS J CHEM INF
[3]   Protein phi and psi dihedral restraints determined from multidimensional hypersurface correlations of backbone chemical shifts and their use in the determination of protein tertiary structures [J].
Beger, RD ;
Bolton, PH .
JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR NMR, 1997, 10 (02) :129-142
[4]   The estrogen receptor relative binding affinities of 188 natural and xenochemicals: Structural diversity of ligands [J].
Blair, RM ;
Fang, H ;
Branham, WS ;
Hass, BS ;
Dial, SL ;
Moland, CL ;
Tong, WD ;
Shi, LM ;
Perkins, R ;
Sheehan, DM .
TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2000, 54 (01) :138-153
[5]   ESTABLISHING A HUMAN TRANSCRIPT MAP [J].
BOGUSKI, MS ;
SCHULER, GD .
NATURE GENETICS, 1995, 10 (04) :369-371
[6]  
Branbury S. P., 1995, TOXICOLOGY, V25, P67
[7]  
Bremser W, 1977, ANAL CHIM ACTA, V103, P355
[8]   Comparative spectra analysis (CoSA): Spectra as three-dimensional molecular descriptors for the prediction of biological activities [J].
Bursi, R ;
Dao, T ;
van Wijk, T ;
de Gooyer, M ;
Kellenbach, E ;
Verwer, P .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 1999, 39 (05) :861-867
[9]   Use of moment of inertia in comparative molecular field analysis to model chromatographic retention of nonpolar solutes [J].
Collantes, ER ;
Tong, WD ;
Welsh, WJ ;
Zielinski, WL .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1996, 68 (13) :2038-2043
[10]   CROSS-VALIDATION, BOOTSTRAPPING, AND PARTIAL LEAST-SQUARES COMPARED WITH MULTIPLE-REGRESSION IN CONVENTIONAL QSAR STUDIES [J].
CRAMER, RD ;
BUNCE, JD ;
PATTERSON, DE ;
FRANK, IE .
QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIPS, 1988, 7 (01) :18-25