Genetic counselling for familial conditions during pregnancy: A review of the literature published during the years 1989-2004

被引:3
作者
Aalfs, C. M.
Smets, E. M. A.
Leschot, N. J.
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Clin Genet, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Med Psychol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
genetic counselling; pregnancy; prenatal diagnosis;
D O I
10.1159/000101757
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background: Genetic counselling for familial conditions during pregnancy may have some disadvantages, such as time pressure and induced worry. However, little is known about the reasons for and consequences of this timing of genetic counselling. Objective: The objective of this study was to provide an overview of research aimed at the counselee's reasons for seeking genetic counselling during pregnancy and the medical-technical and procedural consequences thereof. Methods: We searched the databases Medline and PsycINFO for primary research papers, reviews and case reports, published from 1989 to June 2004. Results: No papers could be retrieved which explicitly addressed our research questions. However, 34 papers, out of a total of 399 papers, covered issues with some relevance to our research questions. Limited knowledge and alertness towards genetics and a greater apparent relevance of genetic issues during pregnancy seemed to explain, at least partly, the timing of referral during pregnancy. Literature on the consequences of this timing for the quality of the genetic counselling process appeared to be scarce. These consequences, therefore, remain unclear. Conclusion: In the literature, little attention is paid to the various aspects of the timing of genetic counselling for familial conditions during pregnancy. More research on this issue is important, with a view to improving the care of pregnant women and their children. Copyright (c) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 168
页数:10
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Genetic counseling for familial conditions during pregnancy: an analysis of patient characteristics [J].
Aalfs, CM ;
Mollema, ED ;
Oort, FJ ;
de Haes, JCJM ;
Leschot, NJ ;
Smets, EMA .
CLINICAL GENETICS, 2004, 66 (02) :112-121
[2]  
Bartels DM, 1997, AM J MED GENET, V72, P172, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19971017)72:2<172::AID-AJMG9>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-X
[4]  
Bernhardt B A, 1993, J Genet Couns, V2, P69, DOI 10.1007/BF00962540
[5]   Coping styles of pregnant women after prenatal ultrasound screening for fetal malformation [J].
Brisch, KH ;
Munz, D ;
Bemmerer-Mayer, K ;
Terinde, R ;
Kreienberg, R ;
Kächele, H .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2003, 55 (02) :91-97
[6]   Professional and personal attitudes about access and confidentiality in the genetic testing of children: A pilot study [J].
Campbell, E ;
Ross, LF .
GENETIC TESTING, 2003, 7 (02) :123-130
[7]   Psychological distress before and after prenatal invasive karyotyping [J].
Cederholm, M ;
Sjödén, PO ;
Axelsson, O .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2001, 80 (06) :539-545
[8]  
Chen E A, 2000, J Genet Couns, V9, P137, DOI 10.1023/A:1009412025722
[9]   IS NONDIRECTIVE GENETIC-COUNSELING POSSIBLE [J].
CLARKE, A .
LANCET, 1991, 338 (8773) :998-1001
[10]  
Clausen H, 1996, CLIN GENET, V49, P200