Implementation of total productive maintenance: A case study

被引:159
作者
Chan, FTS
Lau, HCW
Ip, RWL
Chan, HK
Kong, S
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Ind & Mfg Syst Engn, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Hong Hom, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Mfg Engn & Engn Management, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
autonomous maintenance; continuous improvement; kaizen; performance measurement; total productive maintenance;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.10.021
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The semiconductor industry has gone through significant changes in the last decade. Competition has increased dramatically. Customers focus on product quality, product delivery time and cost of product. Because of these. a company should introduce a quality system to improve and increase both quality and productivity continuously. Total productive maintenance (TPM) is a methodology that aims to increase the availability of existing equipment hence reducing the need for further capital investment. Investment in human resources can further result in better hardware utilisation, higher product quality and reduced labour costs. The aim of the paper is to study the effectiveness and implementation of the TPM programme for an electronics manufacturing company. Through a case study of implementing TPM in an electronics manufacturing company, the practical aspects within and beyond basic TPM theory, difficulties in the adoption of TPM and the problems encountered during the implementation are discussed and analysed. Moreover, the critical success factors for achieving TPM are also included based on the practical results gained from the study. After the implementation of TPM model machine. both tangible and intangible benefits are shown to be obtained for equipment and employees respectively. The productivity of the model machine increased by 83%. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 94
页数:24
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   An international study of quality improvement approach and firm performance [J].
Adam, EE ;
Corbett, LM ;
Flores, BE ;
Harrison, NJ ;
Lee, TS ;
Rho, BH ;
Ribera, J ;
Samson, D ;
Westbrook, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 1997, 17 (9-10) :842-+
[2]   Selecting the most efficient maintenance approach using fuzzy multiple criteria decision making [J].
Al-Najjar, B ;
Alsyouf, I .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2003, 84 (01) :85-100
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, Vol
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1990, INTRO PREDICTIVE MAI
[5]  
Ben-Daya M., 1995, J QUAL MAINT ENG, V1, P20, DOI [10.1108/13552519510083110, DOI 10.1108/13552519510083110]
[6]  
BENDAYA M, 2000, ENGINEERING, V6, P82
[7]   The human factor in advanced manufacturing technology adoption - An empirical analysis [J].
Co, HC ;
Patuwo, BE ;
Hu, MY .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 1998, 18 (1-2) :87-+
[8]   Overall equipment effectiveness as a measure of operational improvement - A practical analysis [J].
Dal, B ;
Tugwell, P ;
Greatbanks, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2000, 20 (11-12) :1488-1502
[9]   Evaluation and improvement of manufacturing performance measurement systems - the role of OEE [J].
Jonsson, P ;
Lesshammar, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 1999, 19 (01) :55-78
[10]  
Jostes R.S., 1994, WORK STUDY, V43, P18, DOI DOI 10.1108/EUM0000000004012