Biweekly vinorelbine and gemcitabine:: a phase I dose-finding study in patients with advanced solid tumors

被引:19
作者
Castellano, D [1 ]
Hitt, R [1 ]
Ciruelos, E [1 ]
Cortés-Funes, H [1 ]
Colomer, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ 12 Octubre, Med Oncol Serv, Div Med Oncol, Madrid 28041, Spain
关键词
advanced solid tumors; biweekly schedule; gemcitabine; metastatic carcinoma; phase I trial; vinorelbine;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdg196
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose of a combination of vinorelbine plus gemcitabine administered on a biweekly schedule in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients and methods: Patients with advanced or refractory solid tumors included in this phase I study were treated with vinorelbine followed by gemcitabine. Vinorelbine was given intravenously over 10 min, and gemcitabine was given intravenously at an fixed-dose infusion rate of 10 mg/m(2)/min. Six dose levels of vinorelbine/gemcitabine were explored: 20/2000, 25/2500, 25/3000, 30/3000, 30/3500 and 30/2500 mg/m(2). Results: Nineteen patients were included in the study. Fourteen patients were pretreated with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. A total of 123 cycles of chemotherapy were administered. DLTs were neutropenic fever and grade 3 asthenia at dose level 5 (30/3500 mg/m(2)); at dose level 4 (30/3000 mg/m(2)) they were grade 3 asthenia, and a radiation-recall reaction and pneumonitis. Sixteen patients were evaluable for efficacy. Five patients had an objective response (one complete response and four partial responses), for an overall response rate of 31%. Conclusions: The recommended dose for phase II study is vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 2500 mg/m(2) administered once every 2 weeks. This regimen is feasible and well-tolerated at this dose, and shows a good clinical activity in all levels explored.
引用
收藏
页码:783 / 787
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
ABBRUZZESE H, 1993, P AM ASS CANC RES, V34
[2]   A PHASE-I CLINICAL, PLASMA, AND CELLULAR PHARMACOLOGY STUDY OF GEMCITABINE [J].
ABBRUZZESE, JL ;
GRUNEWALD, R ;
WEEKS, EA ;
GRAVEL, D ;
ADAMS, T ;
NOWAK, B ;
MINEISHI, S ;
TARASSOFF, P ;
SATTERLEE, W ;
RABER, MN ;
PLUNKETT, W .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1991, 9 (03) :491-498
[3]  
ARBUCK SG, 2003, REVISED COMMON TOXIC
[4]  
ASHIZAWA T, 1993, JPN J CANC CHEMOTHER, V20, P59
[5]  
BESENVAL M, 1989, SEMIN ONCOL, V16, P37
[6]  
CARISTI N, 2000, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V19, pA362
[7]   Diagnosis in oncology -: Side effects of chemotherapy -: Case 2.: Radiation recall reaction induced by gemcitabine [J].
Castellano, D ;
Hitt, R ;
Cortés-Funes, H ;
Romero, A ;
Rodriguez-Peralto, JL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (03) :695-696
[8]  
Colomer R, 2000, SEMIN ONCOL, V27, P20
[9]  
FOSELLA F, 1993, EUR J CANC S6, V29, pS119
[10]   Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine versus vinorelbine alone in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer [J].
Frasci, G ;
Lorusso, V ;
Panza, N ;
Comella, P ;
Nicolella, G ;
Bianco, A ;
De Cataldis, G ;
Iannelli, A ;
Bilancia, D ;
Belli, M ;
Massidda, B ;
Piantedosi, F ;
Comella, G ;
De Lena, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (13) :2529-2536