Budget of tropospheric ozone during TOPSE from two chemical transport models

被引:49
作者
Emmons, LK
Hess, P
Klonecki, A
Tie, X
Horowitz, L
Lamarque, JF
Kinnison, D
Brasseur, G
Atlas, E
Browell, E
Cantrell, C
Eisele, F
Mauldin, RL
Merrill, J
Ridley, B
Shetter, R
机构
[1] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Div Atmospher Chem, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, NOAA, GFDL, Princeton, NJ 08542 USA
[3] Max Planck Inst Meteorol, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany
[4] NASA, Langley Res Ctr, Hampton, VA 23681 USA
[5] Univ Rhode Isl, Grad Sch Oceanog, Ctr Atmospher Chem Studies, Narragansett, RI 02882 USA
关键词
TOPSE; tropospheric ozone; ozone budget; chemical transport model; stratosphere-troposphere exchange;
D O I
10.1029/2002JD002665
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The tropospheric ozone budget during the Tropospheric Ozone Production about the Spring Equinox (TOPSE) campaign has been studied using two chemical transport models ( CTMs): HANK and the Model of Ozone and Related chemical Tracers, version 2 (MOZART-2). The two models have similar chemical schemes but use different meteorological fields, with HANK using MM5 (Pennsylvania State University, National Center for Atmospheric Research Mesoscale Modeling System) and MOZART-2 driven by European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) fields. Both models simulate ozone in good agreement with the observations but underestimate NOx. The models indicate that in the troposphere, averaged over the northern middle and high latitudes, chemical production of ozone drives the increase of ozone seen in the spring. Both ozone gross chemical production and loss increase greatly over the spring months. The in situ production is much larger than the net stratospheric input, and the deposition and horizontal fluxes are relatively small in comparison to chemical destruction. The net production depends sensitively on the concentrations of H2O, HO2 and NO, which differ slightly in the two models. Both models underestimate the chemical production calculated in a steady state model using TOPSE measurements, but the chemical loss rates agree well. Measures of the stratospheric influence on tropospheric ozone in relation to in situ ozone production are discussed. Two different estimates of the stratospheric fraction of O-3 in the Northern Hemisphere troposphere indicate it decreases from 30-50% in February to 15-30% in June. A sensitivity study of the effect of a perturbation in the vertical flux on tropospheric ozone indicates the contribution from the stratosphere is approximately 15%.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Interaction of HNO3 with water-ice surfaces at temperatures of the free troposphere [J].
Abbatt, JPD .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1997, 24 (12) :1479-1482
[2]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[3]   Seasonal variation of mass transport across the tropopause [J].
Appenzeller, C ;
Holton, JR ;
Rosenlof, KH .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1996, 101 (D10) :15071-15078
[4]   The Tropospheric Ozone Production about the Spring Equinox (TOPSE) Experiment: Introduction [J].
Atlas, EL ;
Ridley, BA ;
Cantrell, CA .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D4)
[5]   Sulfur chemistry in the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model: Description, evaluation, features, and sensitivity to aqueous chemistry [J].
Barth, MC ;
Rasch, PJ ;
Kiehl, JT ;
Benkovitz, CM ;
Schwartz, SE .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2000, 105 (D1) :1387-1415
[6]  
Brasseur G.P., 1999, Atmospheric Chemistry and Global Change
[7]   MOZART, a global chemical transport model for ozone and related chemical tracers 1. Model description [J].
Brasseur, GP ;
Hauglustaine, DA ;
Walters, S ;
Rasch, PJ ;
Muller, JF ;
Granier, C ;
Tie, XX .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1998, 103 (D21) :28265-28289
[8]   Ozone, aerosol, potential vorticity, and trace gas trends observed at high-latitudes over North America from February to May 2000 [J].
Browell, EV ;
Hair, JW ;
Butler, CF ;
Grant, WB ;
DeYoung, RJ ;
Fenn, MA ;
Brackett, VG ;
Clayton, MB ;
Brasseur, LA ;
Harper, DB ;
Ridley, BA ;
Klonecki, AA ;
Hess, PG ;
Emmons, LK ;
Tie, XX ;
Atlas, EL ;
Cantrell, CA ;
Wimmers, AJ ;
Blake, DR ;
Coffey, MT ;
Hannigan, JW ;
Dibb, JE ;
Talbot, RW ;
Flocke, F ;
Weinheimer, AJ ;
Fried, A ;
Wert, B ;
Snow, JA ;
Lefer, BL .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D4)
[9]   Steady state free radical budgets and ozone photochemistry during TOPSE [J].
Cantrell, CA ;
Mauldin, L ;
Zondlo, M ;
Eisele, F ;
Kosciuch, E ;
Shetter, R ;
Lefer, B ;
Hall, S ;
Campos, T ;
Ridley, B ;
Walega, J ;
Fried, A ;
Wert, B ;
Flocke, F ;
Weinheimer, A ;
Hannigan, J ;
Coffey, M ;
Atlas, E ;
Stephens, S ;
Heikes, B ;
Snow, J ;
Blake, D ;
Blake, N ;
Katzenstein, A ;
Lopez, J ;
Browell, EV ;
Dibb, J ;
Scheuer, E ;
Seid, G ;
Talbot, R .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D4)
[10]  
*EUR CTR MED RANG, 1995, DESCR ECMWF WCRP LEV