A matrix risk model for the prediction of rapid radiographic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving different dynamic treatment strategies: post hoc analyses from the BeSt study

被引:170
作者
Visser, K. [1 ]
Goekoop-Ruiterman, Y. P. M. [2 ]
de Vries-Bouwstra, J. K. [3 ]
Ronday, H. K. [2 ]
Seys, P. E. H. [4 ]
Kerstens, P. J. S. M. [5 ]
Huizinga, T. W. J.
Dijkmans, B. A. C. [3 ]
Allaart, C. F.
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Rheumatol C1R, NL-2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
[2] HAGA Hosp, The Hague, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Franciscus Hosp, Roosendaal, Netherlands
[5] JBI, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
SMALLEST DETECTABLE DIFFERENCE; CYCLIC CITRULLINATED PEPTIDE; JOINT DAMAGE; COMBINATION THERAPY; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; DISEASE; TRIAL; METHOTREXATE; ANTIBODIES;
D O I
10.1136/ard.2009.121160
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To develop a matrix model for the prediction of rapid radiographic progression (RRP) in subpopulations of patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving different dynamic treatment strategies. Methods Data from 465 patients with recent-onset RA randomised to receive initial monotherapy or combination therapy were used. Predictors for RRP (increase in Sharp-van der Heijde score >= 5 after 1 year) were identified by multivariate logistic regression analysis. For subpopulations, the estimated risk of RRP per treatment group and the number needed to treat (NNT) were visualised in a matrix. Results The presence of autoantibodies, baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) level, erosion score and treatment group were significant independent predictors of RRP in the matrix. Combination therapy was associated with a markedly reduced risk of RRP. The positive and negative predictive values of the matrix were 62% and 91%, respectively. The NNT with initial combination therapy to prevent one patient from RRP with monotherapy was in the range 2-3, 3-7 and 7-25 for patients with a high, intermediate and low predicted risk, respectively. Conclusion The matrix model visualises the risk of RRP for subpopulations of patients with recent-onset RA if treated dynamically with initial monotherapy or combination therapy. Rheumatologists might use the matrix for weighing their initial treatment choice.
引用
收藏
页码:1333 / 1337
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   THE AMERICAN-RHEUMATISM-ASSOCIATION 1987 REVISED CRITERIA FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS [J].
ARNETT, FC ;
EDWORTHY, SM ;
BLOCH, DA ;
MCSHANE, DJ ;
FRIES, JF ;
COOPER, NS ;
HEALEY, LA ;
KAPLAN, SR ;
LIANG, MH ;
LUTHRA, HS ;
MEDSGER, TA ;
MITCHELL, DM ;
NEUSTADT, DH ;
PINALS, RS ;
SCHALLER, JG ;
SHARP, JT ;
WILDER, RL ;
HUNDER, GG .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1988, 31 (03) :315-324
[2]   Radiological outcome in rheumatoid arthritis is predicted by presence of antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptide before and at disease onset, and by IgA-RF at disease onset [J].
Berglin, E ;
Johansson, T ;
Sundin, U ;
Jidell, E ;
Wadell, G ;
Hallmans, G ;
Rantapää-Dahlqvist, S .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2006, 65 (04) :453-458
[3]   The PREMIER study - A multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial of combination therapy with adalimumab plus methotrexate versus methotrexate alone or adalimumab alone in patients with early, aggressive rheumatoid arthritis who had not had previous methotrexate treatment [J].
Breedveld, FC ;
Weisman, MH ;
Kavanaugh, AF ;
Cohen, SB ;
Pavelka, K ;
van Vollenhoven, R ;
Sharp, J ;
Perez, JL ;
Spencer-Green, GT .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2006, 54 (01) :26-37
[4]   Deciding on progression of joint damage in paired films of individual patients: smallest detectable difference or change [J].
Bruynesteyn, K ;
Boers, M ;
Kostense, P ;
van der Linden, S ;
van der Heijde, D .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2005, 64 (02) :179-182
[5]   Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in rheumatoid arthritis joint damage of the Sharp/van der Heijde and Larsen/Scott scoring methods by clinical experts and comparison with the smallest detectable difference [J].
Bruynesteyn, K ;
van der Heijde, D ;
Boers, M ;
Saudan, A ;
Peloso, P ;
Paulus, H ;
Houben, H ;
Griffiths, B ;
Edmonds, J ;
Bresnihan, B ;
Boonen, A ;
van der Linden, S .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2002, 46 (04) :913-920
[6]  
Combe B, 2001, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V44, P1736, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(200108)44:8<1736::AID-ART308>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-I
[8]   Prognostic factors of 10-year radiographic outcome in early rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective study [J].
Courvoisier, Natacha ;
Dougados, Maxime ;
Cantagrel, Alain ;
Goupille, Philippe ;
Meyer, Olivier ;
Sibilia, Jean ;
Daures, Jean Pierre ;
Combe, Bernard .
ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY, 2008, 10 (05)
[9]   Long-term outcome in rheumatoid arthritis: A simple algorithm of baseline parameters can predict radiographic damage, disability, and disease course at 12-year followup [J].
Drossaers-Bakker, KW ;
Zwinderman, AH ;
Vlieland, TPMV ;
Van Zeben, D ;
Vos, K ;
Breedveld, FC ;
Hazes, JMW .
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2002, 47 (04) :383-390
[10]   Long-term impact of early treatment on radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis [J].
Finckh, Axel ;
Liang, Matthew H. ;
van Herckenrode, Carmen Mugica ;
de Pablo, Paola .
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2006, 55 (06) :864-872