Droperidol and the side effects of epidural morphine after cesarean section

被引:30
作者
Sanansilp, V [1 ]
Areewatana, S [1 ]
Tonsukchai, N [1 ]
机构
[1] Siriraj Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-199803000-00016
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Epidural morphine produces analgesia with a high incidence of side effects that include pruritus, nausea, and vomiting. This study investigated whether epidural or IV droperidol could alleviate-these symptoms. In a prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, 97 pregnant women undergoing cesarean section were randomly assigned to three groups. All received standard continuous epidural anesthesia. After delivery, each received 5 mg of epidural morphine with either no droperidol injection, 2.5 mg of epidural droperidol, or 2.5 mg of TV droperidol. The incidence, onset, duration, and severity of pruritus; the onset and severity of pain; and satisfaction were similar for each group, but the incidence and severity of nausea and vomiting was lower in the group that received IV droperidol (P < 0.01). Sedation was minimal throughout the study. Thus, epidural droperidol failed to alleviate the side effects caused by epidural morphine, but IV droperidol reduced both the incidence and severity of nausea and vomiting. These results suggest that droperidol acts systemically to counter the effects of epidural morphine but that it is not entirely effective. Implications: A single dose of epidural morphine provides long-lasting pain relief for women who have undergone cesarean section, but it has some troublesome side effects (itching, nausea, vomiting). We performed a prospective, randomized, controlled trial in 97 such women to study whether droperidol could reduce these side effects. We found that TV droperidol reduced nausea and vomiting but did not prevent itching, and that epidural droperidol failed to prevent all side effects.
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 537
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   POTENTIATION OF EPIDURAL OPIOIDS WITH EPIDURAL DROPERIDOL - A ONE YEAR RETROSPECTIVE STUDY [J].
BACH, V ;
CARL, P ;
RAVLO, O ;
CRAWFORD, ME ;
WERNER, M .
ANAESTHESIA, 1986, 41 (11) :1116-1119
[2]   ITCHING AFTER EPIDURAL AND SPINAL OPIATES [J].
BALLANTYNE, JC ;
LOACH, AB ;
CARR, DB .
PAIN, 1988, 33 (02) :149-160
[3]   SUBHYPNOTIC DOSES OF PROPOFOL RELIEVE PRURITUS INDUCED BY EPIDURAL AND INTRATHECAL MORPHINE [J].
BORGEAT, A ;
WILDERSMITH, OHG ;
SAIAH, M ;
RIFAT, K .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 76 (04) :510-512
[4]  
BROMAGE PR, 1982, ANESTH ANALG, V61, P490
[5]   SIDE-EFFECTS OF INTRATHECAL AND EPIDURAL OPIOIDS [J].
CHANEY, MA .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1995, 42 (10) :891-903
[6]  
COHEN SE, 1991, REGION ANESTH, V16, P141
[7]   THE ROLE OF EPIDURAL MORPHINE IN THE POSTCESAREAN PATIENT - EFFICACY AND EFFECTS ON BONDING [J].
COHEN, SE ;
WOODS, WA .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1983, 58 (06) :500-504
[8]   TREATMENT OF NAUSEA WITH EXTRADURAL DROPERIDOL [J].
CORBEY, MP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1986, 58 (10) :1202-1202
[9]   THE EFFECT OF EPINEPHRINE IN LOCAL-ANESTHETIC ON EPIDURAL MORPHINE-INDUCED PRURITUS [J].
DOUGLAS, MJ ;
ROSS, PLE ;
MCMORLAND, GH .
CANADIAN ANAESTHETISTS SOCIETY JOURNAL, 1986, 33 (06) :737-740
[10]  
ELDOR J, 1994, REGION ANESTH, V19, P433