Improved epidural analgesia in the parturient in the 30° tilt position

被引:5
作者
Beilin, Y
Abramovitz, SE
Zahn, J
Enis, S
Hossain, S
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, New York, NY 10029 USA
[3] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Biomath Sci, New York, NY 10029 USA
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE | 2000年 / 47卷 / 12期
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF03019865
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the incidence of incomplete analgesia when epidural local anesthetic is administered with the parturient supine in a 30 degrees leftward tilt or in the left lateral decubitus position. Methods: After placement of a multiorifice catheter 5 cm into the epidural space, 293 women in active labour were randomly positioned either to the left lateral decubitus position (lateral group) or supine with a 30 degrees leftward tilt (tilt group) and then received 13 mt bupivacaine 0.25%. The success of the epidural block was determined by asking the patient if she required additional medication 15 min later. The incidence of complications (fetal heart rate decelerations, hypotension, and ephedrine usage) was noted. Results: In the lateral group, 38% required additional medication compared with 24% in the tilt group (P = 0.006). There were no differences between groups in the incidence of maternal hypotension or fetal heart rate decelerations, but more women (10%) received ephedrine in the lateral than in the tilt group (4%), P = 0.035, Conclusions: Placing the parturient supine with a 30 degrees leftward tilt is associated with a greater success rate of labour epidural analgesia without an increase in complications than in women in the left lateral decubitus position. This advantage should be considered when positioning the parturient after epidural catheter placement.
引用
收藏
页码:1176 / 1181
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
APOSTOLOU GA, 1981, ANESTH ANALG, V60, P584
[2]  
BEILIN Y, 1995, ANESTH ANALG, V81, P301
[3]  
Collier C B, 1996, Int J Obstet Anesth, V5, P19, DOI 10.1016/S0959-289X(96)80070-7
[4]   A comparison of multiport and uniport epidural catheters in laboring patients [J].
DAngelo, R ;
Foss, ML ;
Livesay, CH .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 84 (06) :1276-1279
[5]   The effect of maternal position on fetal heart rate during epidural or intrathecal labor analgesia [J].
Eberle, RL ;
Norris, MC ;
Eberle, AM ;
Naulty, JS ;
Arkoosh, VA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 179 (01) :150-155
[6]   EPINEPHRINE ENHANCES ANALGESIA PRODUCED BY EPIDURAL BUPIVACAINE DURING LABOR [J].
EISENACH, JC ;
GRICE, SC ;
DEWAN, DM .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1987, 66 (05) :447-451
[7]  
GRUNDY EM, 1978, ANESTH ANALG, V57, P95
[8]   LUMBAR EXTRADURAL INJECTION PRESSURES IN PREGNANT-WOMEN - INVESTIGATION OF RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN RATE OF INJECTION, INJECTION PRESSURES AND EXTENT OF ANALGESIA [J].
HUSEMEYER, RP ;
WHITE, DC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1980, 52 (01) :55-60
[9]  
KIM YI, 1975, OBSTET GYNECOL, V46, P362
[10]  
KINSELLA SM, 1994, OBSTET GYNECOL, V83, P774