Is radical prostatectomy feasible in all cases of locally advanced non-bone metastatic prostate cancer? Results of a single-institution study

被引:55
作者
Gontero, Paolo
Marchioro, Giansilvio
Pisani, Roberta
Zaramella, Stefano
Sogni, Filippo
Kocjancic, Ervin
Mondaini, Nicola
Bonvini, Daniele
Tizzani, Alessandro
Frea, Bruno
机构
[1] Univ Turin, Clin Urol 1, Turin, Italy
[2] Univ Piemonte Orientale, Urol Clin, Novara, Italy
[3] Univ Florence, Urol Clin, I-50121 Florence, Italy
[4] Univ Piemonte Orientale, Dipartimento Igiene & Stat, Novara, Italy
关键词
advanced prostate cancer; morbidity; radical prostatectomy; survival;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2006.08.050
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
lObjectives: Previous prospective studies of the surgical treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer have enrolled patients selected on the basis of a limited T3 disease extension. The aim of the present study was to assess the feasibility and the oncologic outcome of radical prostatectomy administered to a consecutive unselected series of advanced, non-bone metastatic prostate cancers. Methods: Between March 1998 and February 2003 radical prostatectomy was offered at our institution to any patient diagnosed with prostate cancer with no sign of extranodal metastatic disease. Data on morbidity and survival for S1 clinically advanced cases (any T >= 3, N0-N1, or any NI or M1a disease according to the TNM 2002 classification system) operated on by a single expert surgeon were compared with a series of 152 radical prostatectomies performed during the same period by the same operator for clinically organ-confined disease. Adjuvant treatment was administered according to current guidelines. Results: The two groups did not differ significantly in surgical morbidity except for blood transfusion, operative time, and lymphoceles, which showed a higher rate in patients with advanced disease. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival and prostate cancer-specific survival at 7 yr were 76.69% and 90.2% in the advanced disease group and 88.4% and 99.3% in the organ-confined disease group, respectively. Conclusions: Even in the scenario of extensive surgical indications up to M1a disease, radical prostatectomy proved to be technically feasible and to have an acceptable morbidity rate compared with organ-confined disease. Our initial survival data strengthen the role for surgery as an essential part in the multimodal approach to treating advanced prostate cancer. (c) 2006 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:922 / 930
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   EAU guidelines on prostate cancer [J].
Aus, G ;
Abbou, CC ;
Bolla, M ;
Heidenreich, A ;
Schmid, HP ;
van Poppel, H ;
Wolff, J ;
Zattoni, F .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2005, 48 (04) :546-551
[2]   Improved survival in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy and goserelin [J].
Bolla, M ;
Gonzalez, D ;
Warde, P ;
Dubois, JB ;
Mirimanoff, RO ;
Storme, G ;
Bernier, J ;
Kuten, A ;
Sternberg, C ;
Gil, T ;
Collette, L ;
Pierart, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 337 (05) :295-300
[3]   Long-term results with immediate androgen suppression and external irradiation in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (an EORTC study): a phase III randomised trial [J].
Bolla, M ;
Collette, L ;
Blank, L ;
Warde, P ;
Dubois, JB ;
Mirimanoff, RO ;
Storme, G ;
Bernier, J ;
Kuten, A ;
Sternberg, C ;
Mattelaer, J ;
Torecilla, JL ;
Pfeffer, JR ;
Cutajar, CL ;
Zurlo, A ;
Pierart, M .
LANCET, 2002, 360 (9327) :103-108
[4]   Validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of lymph node invasion among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and an extended pelvic lymphadenectomy [J].
Briganti, Alberto ;
Chun, Felix K. -H. ;
Salonia, Andrea ;
Zanni, Giuseppe ;
Scattoni, Vincenzo ;
Valiquette, Luc ;
Rigatti, Patrizio ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 49 (06) :1019-1027
[5]   Radical radiation for localized prostate cancer: Local persistence of disease results in a late wave of metastases [J].
Coen, JJ ;
Zietman, AL ;
Thakral, H ;
Shipley, WU .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (15) :3199-3205
[6]   Postradiotherapy prostate biopsies: What do they really mean? Results for 498 patients [J].
Crook, J ;
Malone, S ;
Perry, G ;
Bahadur, Y ;
Robertson, S ;
Abdolell, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 48 (02) :355-367
[7]   Results of radical prostatectomy in men with locally advanced prostate cancer: Multi-institutional pooled analysis [J].
Gerber, GS ;
Thisted, RA ;
Chodak, GW ;
Schroder, FH ;
Frohmuller, HGW ;
Scardino, PT ;
Paulson, DF ;
Middleton, AW ;
Rukstalis, DB ;
Smith, JA ;
Ohori, M ;
Theiss, M ;
Schellhammer, PF .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1997, 32 (04) :385-390
[8]  
Gontero P, 1998, EUR UROL, V34, P518, DOI 10.1159/000019793
[9]   Anatomical extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy in bladder and prostate cancer [J].
Heidenreich, A ;
Ohlmann, CH ;
Polyakov, S .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2005, 4 (04) :15-24
[10]   Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients [J].
Hull, GW ;
Rabbani, F ;
Abbas, F ;
Wheeler, TM ;
Kattan, MW ;
Scardino, PT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (02) :528-534