Variations in elastic thickness in the Canadian Shield

被引:52
作者
Audet, P [1 ]
Mareschal, JC [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Quebec, Ctr Rech Geochim & Geodynam, Geotop, UQAM McGill, Montreal, PQ H3C3P8, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
lithosphere; elastic thickness; gravity; isostasy;
D O I
10.1016/j.epsl.2004.07.035
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
We have compared different spectral methods (the standard windowed Fourier transform, the multitaper method (MTM), and the maximum entropy method (MEM)) to determine the coherence between Bouguer gravity and topography and estimate the variations of the effective elastic thickness (T-e) of the lithosphere. These methods differ significantly in spatial resolution (1000 to 2000 km) determined by the width of the windows required to resolve the wavelength of transition from low to high coherence. The tests with synthetic data show that the standard deviation on elastic thickness estimates is high with the three methods but that the mean value obtained by the maximum entropy is close to the input value, while the other methods underestimate the elastic thickness. In the Canadian Shield, the effective elastic thickness values vary from approximate to40 km to > 100 km over distances less than the width of the moving window. There is no clear geographical or geological pattern in these variations as high and low elastic thickness values are found near the edge as well as in the center of the continent, and in all provinces regardless of their age. Correlation between T-e and the heat flow field is weak. The values of T-e being much higher beneath Hudson Bay than the Williston Basin are consistent with models of basin evolution and seismic estimates of mantle temperatures. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 31
页数:15
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, SPECTRAL ANAL PHYS A, DOI [10.1017/cbo9780511622762, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511622762, 10.1017/CBO9780511622762]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, ISOSTASY FLEXURE LIT, DOI DOI 10.1029/JB089IB13P11517
[3]   Spatial variations in Te in the southern Appalachians, eastern United States [J].
Armstrong, GD ;
Watts, AB .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2001, 106 (B10) :22009-22026
[4]   Erosion as a driving mechanism of intracontinental mountain growth [J].
Avouac, JP ;
Burov, EB .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 1996, 101 (B8) :17747-17769
[5]   ISOSTATIC COMPENSATION ON A CONTINENTAL SCALE - LOCAL VERSUS REGIONAL MECHANISMS [J].
BANKS, RJ ;
PARKER, RL ;
HUESTIS, SP .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 1977, 51 (02) :431-452
[6]   FORELAND BASINS [J].
BEAUMONT, C .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 1981, 65 (02) :291-329
[7]   VARIATIONS IN EFFECTIVE ELASTIC THICKNESS OF THE NORTH-AMERICAN LITHOSPHERE [J].
BECHTEL, TD ;
FORSYTH, DW ;
SHARPTON, VL ;
GRIEVE, RAF .
NATURE, 1990, 343 (6259) :636-638
[8]  
BURG JP, 1978, MODERN SPECTRAL ANAL
[9]   Large-scale crustal heterogeneities and lithospheric strength in cratons [J].
Burov, E ;
Jaupart, C ;
Mareschal, JC .
EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 1998, 164 (1-2) :205-219
[10]   THE EFFECTIVE ELASTIC THICKNESS (T-E) OF CONTINENTAL LITHOSPHERE - WHAT DOES IT REALLY MEAN [J].
BUROV, EB ;
DIAMENT, M .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 1995, 100 (B3) :3905-3927