Ten years of GOME/ERS2 total ozone data - The new GOME data processor (GDP) version 4: 2. Ground-based validation and comparisons with TOMS V7/V8

被引:58
作者
Balis, D.
Lambert, J. -C.
Van Roozendael, M.
Spurr, R.
Loyola, D.
Livschitz, Y.
Valks, P.
Amiridis, V.
Gerard, P.
Granville, J.
Zehner, C.
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
[2] Belgian Inst Space Aeron, B-1180 Brussels, Belgium
[3] RT Solut Inc, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[4] German Aerosp Ctr, Remote Sensing Technol Inst, IMF, D-82234 Wessling, Germany
[5] ESA, ESRIN, Ctr Earth Observat, I-00044 Frascati, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2005JD006376
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
[1] The atmospheric chemistry instrument Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME) was launched in April 1995 on the ERS-2 platform. The GOME data processor (GDP) operational retrieval algorithm has produced total ozone columns since July 1995. With a data record of over ten years, GOME has become important for ozone trend analysis. In 2004, GDP was upgraded to version 4.0, a new validation was performed, and the entire GOME data record was reprocessed. In the preceding paper (Van Roozendael et al., 2006), the GDP 4.0 algorithm was described. In this paper, we deal with geophysical validation of the GDP 4.0 algorithm and the retrieved ozone products. We present results of a validation exercise involving comparisons of GDP 4.0 total ozone with the Network for Detection of Stratospheric Change (NDSC) and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO)/Global Atmospheric Watch (GAW) ground-based networks. We compare these results with similar validations of earlier GDP ozone products. We also present ground-based validation of TOMS versions 7 and 8 total ozone products, and we contrast these with GDP 4.0 values. On a global basis, GDP 4.0 total ozone results lie between -1% and +1.5% of ground-based values for solar zenith angles less than 70 degrees; accuracy is now comparable to that obtainable from ground-based stations. At higher solar zenith angles in polar regions, larger discrepancies of up to +5% are found; in these regimes, errors on both satellite and ground-based measurements are higher. The validation also showed marked improvement in TOMS total ozone performance for the version 8 algorithm.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1957, ANN INT GEOPHYS YEAR
[3]   Bias in Dobson total ozone measurements at high latitudes due to approximations in calculations of ozone absorption coefficients and air mass [J].
Bernhard, G ;
Evans, RD ;
Labow, GJ ;
Oltmans, SJ .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2005, 110 (D10) :1-10
[4]  
Bovensmann H, 1999, J ATMOS SCI, V56, P127, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<0127:SMOAMM>2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]   Comparison of total ozone from the satellite instruments GOME and TOMS with measurements from the Dobson network 1996-2000 [J].
Bramstedt, K ;
Gleason, J ;
Loyola, D ;
Thomas, W ;
Bracher, A ;
Weber, M ;
Burrows, JP .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2003, 3 :1409-1419
[7]   TEMPERATURE-DEPENDENCE OF THE OZONE ABSORPTION-SPECTRUM OVER THE WAVELENGTH RANGE 410 TO 760 NM [J].
BURKHOLDER, JB ;
TALUKDAR, RK .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1994, 21 (07) :581-584
[8]  
Burrows JP, 1999, J ATMOS SCI, V56, P151, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<0151:TGOMEG>2.0.CO
[9]  
2
[10]   Total ozone retrieval from GOME UV spectral data using the weighting function DOAS approach [J].
Coldewey-Egbers, M ;
Weber, M ;
Lamsal, LN ;
de Beck, R ;
Buchwitz, M ;
Burrows, JP .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2005, 5 :1015-1025