Prevention of transplacental transmission of moderate-virulent classical swine fever virus after single or double vaccination with an E2 subunit vaccine

被引:31
作者
de Smit, AJ [1 ]
Bouma, A [1 ]
de Kluijver, EP [1 ]
Terpstra, C [1 ]
Moormann, RJM [1 ]
机构
[1] ID Lelystad, Inst Anim Sci & Hlth, Natl Reference Lab Class Swine Fever, NL-8200 AB Lelystad, Netherlands
关键词
CSF virus; transplacental transmission; subunit marker vaccine;
D O I
10.1080/01652176.2000.9695045
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The use of a vaccine against classical swine fever virus (CSFV) during an outbreak of CSF should lead to a reduction in the horizontal or vertical transmission of CSFV, The reduction of vertical, i.e. transplacental, transmission of a moderate-virulent strain of CSFV from the sow to its offspring was studied in sows vaccinated once or twice with a CSFV E2 subunit vaccine. Two groups of nine sows were vaccinated with one PD95 dose of the E2 subunit vaccine, approximately four weeks before insemination. A third group of nine inseminated sows served as controls. One group of nine sows were vaccinated again at two weeks after insemination, At ten weeks after the primary vaccination, approximately six weeks after insemination, all 27 sows were challenged intranasally with 10(5) TCID50 of a moderate-virulent strain of CSFV, the Van Zoelen strain. The sows were euthanized at five weeks after challenge, and samples from the sows and fetuses were collected for detection of CSFV, All 27 sows were in gestation at the time of slaughter, CSFV was detected in the fetuses of all unvaccinated sows but it was not detected in any of the samples collected from fetuses of the double-vaccinated sows. Virus was however recovered from the fetuses of one out of nine sows vaccinated once. All the sows, except four double-vaccinated sows, developed CSFV E-rns antibodies. Transplacental transmission of CSFV was reduced significantly (p < 0.001) in all vaccinated sows. When the results from the experiment were extrapolated to a herd level, it could be concluded that, with 95% certainty, approximately 11% (single vaccination) or 0% (double vaccination), confidence intervals of 0.01-0.44 and 0.0-0.30 respectively, of the pregnant sows would still not be protected against vertical transmission of moderate-virulent CSFV. We conclude that vaccination with the CSFV E-2 subunit vaccine can reduce the transmission of moderate-virulent strain of CSFV from the sow to its offspring significantly.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 153
页数:4
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   RUBELLA VACCINES - PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE [J].
BEST, JM .
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 1991, 107 (01) :17-30
[2]   Efficacy and stability of a subunit vaccine based on glycoprotein E2 of classical swine fever virus [J].
Bouma, A ;
de Smit, AJ ;
de Kluijver, EP ;
Terpstra, C ;
Moormann, RJM .
VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 1999, 66 (02) :101-114
[3]  
BOUMA A, IN PRESS VACCINE
[4]   An experimental multivalent bovine virus diarrhea virus E2 subunit vaccine and two experimental conventionally inactivated vaccines induce partial fetal protection in sheep [J].
Bruschke, CJM ;
van Oirschot, JT ;
van Rijn, PA .
VACCINE, 1999, 17 (15-16) :1983-1991
[5]   An improved ELISA for the detection of serum antibodies directed against classical swine fever virus [J].
Colijn, EO ;
Bloemraad, M ;
Wensvoort, G .
VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 1997, 59 (01) :15-25
[6]  
DESMIT AJ, 1999, IN PRESS PREV VET ME
[7]  
FREY HR, 1980, ZBL VET MED B, V27, P154
[8]   VERTICAL TRANSMISSION OF BORDER DISEASE INFECTION [J].
GARDINER, AC ;
BARLOW, RM .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PATHOLOGY, 1981, 91 (03) :467-470
[9]   Rubella virus genome diagnosis during pregnancy and mechanism of congenital rubella [J].
Katow, S .
INTERVIROLOGY, 1998, 41 (4-5) :163-169
[10]   Incidence of classical swine fever (CSF) in wild boar in a densely populated area indicating CSF virus persistence as a mechanism for virus perpetuation [J].
Kern, B ;
Depner, KR ;
Letz, W ;
Rott, M ;
Thalheim, S ;
Nitschke, B ;
Plagemann, R ;
Liess, B .
JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE SERIES B-INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND VETERINARY PUBLIC HEALTH, 1999, 46 (01) :63-67