Local recurrence of rectal cancer:: MR imaging before and after oral superparamagnetic particles vs contrast-enhanced computed tomography

被引:16
作者
Blomqvist, L [1 ]
Ohlsén, H
Hindmarsh, T
Jonsson, E
Holm, T
机构
[1] Karolinska Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, S-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Hosp, MR Res Ctr, S-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Nycomed Amersham AB, S-18124 Lidingo, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Hosp, Dept Surg, S-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
MR imaging; CT; rectum; neoplasms; comparative studies;
D O I
10.1007/s003300000372
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to compare three ig strategies for the diagnosis of local recurrence of rectal cancer: (a) MR imaging; (b) MR imaging after administration of enteral superparamagnetic particles (Ferristene); and (c) contrast-enhanced CT. Seventeen patients with previous surgery for rectal cancer were examined, 12 patients with local tumour recurrence in the pelvis and 5 patients with postoperative changes. Pelvic multi-coil MR imaging before and after oral administration of superparamagnetic contrast, medium [Abdoscan (Ferristene USAN), Nycombed-Amersham, Lidingo, Sweden] as well as abdominal and pelvic CT was performed in all patients. The examinations were independently evaluated by three different radiologists. The general effect of the II MR contrast medium, the delineation of normal pathological structures as well as confidence in diagnosis were registered on a visual analog scale (VAS). The diagnosis according to MR before and after oral contrast medium, and CT, was compared, in patients, with the final diagnosis which was verified by biopsy (n = 3), surgery (n = 6), clinical follow-up (n = 4) and by follow-up with MR or CT (n = 3). No significant improvement in MR image quality was found after enteral contrast medium. post-contrast MR diagnosis was not changed in any of the patients. The diagnosis on MR correlated with the final diagnosis in 12 of 16 patients (sensitivity 91%, accuracy 62%) and the diagnosis on CT in 11 of 16 patients (sensitivity 82%, accuracy 56%), The radiologists' "confidence" in the diagnosis and the degree of accordance with the final diagnosis did not score higher on MR after than before oral contrast ministration; however, the accordance with the final diagnosis scored better on MR than on CT. No advantages of orally administered superparamagnetic contrast medium were observed in the examination patient group. Magnetic resonance is preferable to CT in diagnosing local tumour recurrence.
引用
收藏
页码:1383 / 1389
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   MRI AND DYNAMIC CT IN THE FOLLOW-UP OF RECTAL-CANCER [J].
BACHMANN, G ;
PFEIFER, T ;
BAUER, T .
FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIETE DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER NEUEN BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 1994, 161 (03) :214-219
[2]  
Blomqvist L, 1996, ACTA RADIOL, V37, P779
[3]   ORAL CONTRAST-MEDIA FOR THE MAGNETIC-RESONANCE TOMOGRAPHY OF THE ABDOMEN .3. 1ST PATIENT EXAMINATIONS WITH GADOLINIUM-DTPA [J].
CLAUSSEN, C ;
KORNMESSER, W ;
LANIADO, M ;
KAMINSKY, S ;
HAMM, B ;
FELIX, R .
FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIETE DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER NUKLEARMEDIZIN, 1988, 148 (06) :683-689
[4]   MR cholangiopancreatography and MR urography: Improved enhancement with a negative oral contrast agent [J].
Hirohashi, S ;
Hirohashi, R ;
Uchida, H ;
Kitano, S ;
Ono, W ;
Ohnishi, H ;
Nakanishi, S .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 203 (01) :281-285
[5]   Oral magnetic particles (ferristene) as a contrast medium in abdominal magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Jacobsen, TF ;
Laniado, M ;
VanBeers, BE ;
Dupas, B ;
Boudghene, FP ;
Rummeny, E ;
Falke, THM ;
Rinck, PA ;
MacVicar, D ;
Lundby, B .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1996, 3 (07) :571-580
[6]   Dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction versus T2-weighted spin-echo MR imaging in the follow-up of colorectal neoplasm: A prospective study of 41 patients [J].
Kinkel, K ;
Tardivon, AA ;
Soyer, P ;
Spatz, A ;
Lasser, P ;
Rougier, P ;
Vanel, D .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 200 (02) :453-458
[7]   EVALUATION OF ORAL CONTRAST AGENTS FOR ABDOMINAL MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING [J].
KRAUS, BB ;
RAPPAPORT, DC ;
ROS, PR ;
TORRES, GM .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1994, 12 (06) :847-858
[8]   RECURRENT RECTAL-CANCER - DIAGNOSIS WITH MR IMAGING VERSUS CT [J].
KRESTIN, GP ;
STEINBRICH, W ;
FRIEDMANN, G .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 168 (02) :307-311
[9]   PHASE-III TRIAL OF ORAL MAGNETIC PARTICLES IN MRI OF ABDOMEN AND PELVIS [J].
MACVICAR, D ;
JACOBSEN, TF ;
GUY, R ;
HUSBAND, JE .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1993, 47 (03) :183-188
[10]   MRI of recurrent rectosigmoid carcinoma [J].
Markus, J ;
Morrissey, B ;
deGara, C ;
Tarulli, G .
ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 1997, 22 (03) :338-342