Neoadjuvant docetaxel and estramustine chemotherapy in high-risk/locally advanced prostate cancer

被引:91
作者
Hussain, M
Smith, DC
El-Rayes, BF
Du, W
Vaishampayan, U
Fontana, J
Sakr, W
Wood, D
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Ctr Comprehens Canc 7314, Div Hematol & Oncol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Wayne State Univ, Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Div Hematol Oncol, Detroit, MI USA
[3] Wayne State Univ, Dept Pathol, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[4] Wayne State Univ, Dept Urol, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[5] Barbara Ann Karmanos Canc Inst, Detroit, MI USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02519-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant docetaxel and estramustine in patients with high-risk, newly diagnosed, prostate cancer. Methods. Eligible patients had prostate cancer with one or more of the following criteria: clinical Stage T2b or greater, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of 15 ng/mL or greater, and/or Gleason score of 8 to 10. Chemotherapy consisted of docetaxel (70 mg/m(2)) on day 1 and estramustine (280 mg three times daily) on days 1 to 3 every 21 days for three to six courses. This was followed by local therapy, as deemed appropriate. Results. Twenty-one patients with a median age of 60 years, median PSA level of 16.1 ng/mL (range 2.4 to 175), and median baseline testosterone of 3.4 ng/mL were enrolled. Seven patients met one of the inclusion criteria, 10 met two, and 4 met three. The Gleason score was 8 or greater in 14 patients. A median of five cycles of chemotherapy was delivered. The most frequent high-grade toxicities were grade 3 (8 patients) and 4 (1 patient) neutropenia and deep venous thrombosis (grade 3 in 2 patients) before institution of low-dose warfarin. All patients responded as determined by protocol-defined criteria. Ten patients underwent radical prostatectomy, with negative surgical margins in 7 patients, and 11 received radiotherapy with negative preradiotherapy biopsies in 2. Conclusions. Induction docetaxel and estramustine is well tolerated and feasible in patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk prostate cancer. This combination is active; however, its efficacy relative to hormonal therapy will require a controlled randomized trial. (C) 2003, Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:774 / 780
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Neoadjuvant estramustine and etoposide followed by concurrent estramustine and definitive radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: Feasibility and preliminary results
    Ben-Josef, E
    Porter, AT
    Han, S
    Mertens, W
    Chuba, P
    Fontana, J
    Hussain, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 49 (03): : 699 - 703
  • [2] Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy in prostate cancer
    Chay, C
    Smith, DC
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2001, 28 (01) : 3 - 12
  • [3] Phase II trial of neoadjuvant estramustine and etoposide plus radical prostatectomy for locally advanced prostate cancer
    Clark, PE
    Peereboom, DM
    Dreicher, R
    Levin, HS
    Clark, SB
    Klein, EA
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2001, 57 (02) : 281 - 285
  • [4] Craft N, 1999, CANCER RES, V59, P5030
  • [5] Dreicer R, 2001, SEMIN ONCOL, V28, P45
  • [6] Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer
    Fisher, B
    Bryant, J
    Wolmark, N
    Mamounas, E
    Brown, A
    Fisher, ER
    Wickerham, DL
    Begovic, M
    DeCillis, A
    Robidoux, A
    Margolese, RG
    Cruz, AB
    Hoehn, JL
    Lees, AW
    Dimitrov, NV
    Bear, HD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (08) : 2672 - 2685
  • [7] ONE-SAMPLE MULTIPLE TESTING PROCEDURE FOR PHASE-II CLINICAL-TRIALS
    FLEMING, TR
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1982, 38 (01) : 143 - 151
  • [8] Randomized comparative study of 3 versus 8-month neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy: Biochemical and pathological effects
    Gleave, ME
    Goldenberg, SL
    Chin, JL
    Warner, J
    Saad, F
    Klotz, LH
    Jewett, M
    Kassabian, V
    Chetner, M
    Dupont, C
    Van Rensselaer, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (02) : 500 - 506
  • [9] Randomized, prospective, controlled study comparing radical prostatectomy alone and neoadjuvant androgen withdrawal in the treatment of localized prostate cancer
    Goldenberg, SL
    Klotz, LH
    Srigley, J
    Jewett, MAS
    Mador, D
    Fradet, Y
    Barkin, J
    Chin, J
    Paquin, JM
    Bullock, MJ
    Sullivan, LD
    Gleave, ME
    McLoughlin, MG
    Prestage, K
    Kinahan, TJ
    Orovan, WL
    Whelan, JP
    Herschorn, S
    Keresteci, AG
    Robinette, M
    Bruce, A
    Stewart, DA
    Ruether, JD
    Ernst, DS
    Chetner, M
    Metcalfe, JB
    Elhilali, M
    Aprikian, AG
    Bertrand, PE
    Schick, E
    Tessier, J
    Halsall, AK
    Weckworth, PF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 156 (03) : 873 - 877
  • [10] Khil MS, 1997, CANCER J, V3, P289