Spatial patterns in species distributions reveal biodiversity change

被引:174
作者
Wilson, RJ
Thomas, CD
Fox, R
Roy, DB
Kunin, WE
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Sch Biol, Ctr Biodivers & Conservat, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Butterfly Conservat, Wareham BH20 5QP, Dorset, England
[3] NERC, Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Huntingdon PE28 2LS, Cambs, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1038/nature03031
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Interpretation of global biodiversity change is hampered by a lack of information on the historical status of most species in most parts of the world(1-5). Here we show that declines and increases can be deduced from current species distributions alone, using spatial patterns of occupancy combined with distribution size. Declining species show sparse, fragmented distributions for their distribution size, reflecting the extinction process; expanding species show denser, more aggregated distributions, reflecting colonization. Past distribution size changes for British butterflies were deduced successfully from current distributions, and former distributions had some power to predict future change. What is more, the relationship between distribution pattern and change in British butterflies independently predicted distribution change for butterfly species in Flanders, Belgium, and distribution change in British rare plant species is similarly related to spatial distribution pattern. This link between current distribution patterns and processes of distribution change could be used to assess relative levels of threat facing different species, even for regions and taxa lacking detailed historical and ecological information.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 396
页数:4
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Making consistent IUCN classifications under uncertainty [J].
Akçakaya, HR ;
Ferson, S ;
Burgman, MA ;
Keith, DA ;
Mace, GM ;
Todd, CR .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2000, 14 (04) :1001-1013
[2]  
Asher J., 2001, MILLENNIUM ATLAS BUT
[3]   Time lag between deforestation and bird extinction in tropical forest fragments [J].
Brooks, TM ;
Pimm, SL ;
Oyugi, JO .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1999, 13 (05) :1140-1150
[4]   SPATIAL VARIATION IN ABUNDANCE [J].
BROWN, JH ;
MEHLMAN, DW ;
STEVENS, GC .
ECOLOGY, 1995, 76 (07) :2028-2043
[5]   DIRECTIONS IN CONSERVATION BIOLOGY [J].
CAUGHLEY, G .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1994, 63 (02) :215-244
[6]   Dynamic biogeography and conservation of endangered species [J].
Channell, R ;
Lomolino, MV .
NATURE, 2000, 403 (6765) :84-86
[7]   Spatial patterns in the distribution of tropical tree species [J].
Condit, R ;
Ashton, PS ;
Baker, P ;
Bunyavejchewin, S ;
Gunatilleke, S ;
Gunatilleke, N ;
Hubbell, SP ;
Foster, RB ;
Itoh, A ;
LaFrankie, JV ;
Lee, HS ;
Losos, E ;
Manokaran, N ;
Sukumar, R ;
Yamakura, T .
SCIENCE, 2000, 288 (5470) :1414-1418
[8]   Flight areas of British butterflies: assessing species status and decline [J].
Cowley, MJR ;
Thomas, CD ;
Thomas, JA ;
Warren, MS .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1999, 266 (1428) :1587-1592
[9]  
Groombridge B., 2002, WORLD ATLAS BIODIVER
[10]  
Hanski L., 1999, Metapopulation Ecology