European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for cervical cytology terminology

被引:66
作者
Herbert, A. [1 ]
Bergeron, C.
Wiener, H.
Schenck, U.
Klinkhamer, P.
Bulten, J.
Arbyn, M.
机构
[1] Guys & St Thomas Hosp, NHS Fdn Trust, London SE1 9RT, England
[2] Lab Pasteur Cerba, Cergy Pontoise, France
[3] Univ Vienna, Inst Clin Pathol, Vienna, Austria
[4] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Pathol, D-8000 Munich, Germany
[5] PAMM, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[6] Univ Nijmegen St Radboud Hosp, Med Ctr, Inst Pathol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[7] Sci Inst Publ Hlth, Canc Epidemiol Unit, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
European guidelines; cervical cancer screening; cervical cytology terminology; sample adequacy; Bethesda system; quality assurance;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2303.2007.00469.x
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
There are many different systems of cytology classification used in the member states of the European Union (EU) and many different languages. The following short annexe to Chapter 3 of the European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening provides a framework that will allow different terminologies and languages to be translated into standard terminology based on the Bethesda system (TBS) for cytology while retaining the cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) classification for histology. This approach has followed extensive consultation with representatives of many countries and professional groups as well as a discussion forum published in Cytopathology (2005;16:113). This article will describe the reporting of specimen adequacy, which is dealt with in more detail elsewhere in Chapter 3 of the guidelines, the optional general categorization recommended in TBS, the interpretation/cytology result and other comments that may be made on reports such as concurrent human papillomavirus testing and the use of automation review and recommendations for management. The main categories in TBS will be described in the context of CIN, dyskaryosis and dysplasia terminologies so that all may be translated into the same framework. These guidelines should allow European countries to adapt their terminology in such a way as to make their screening programmes comparable with each other as well as with programmes elsewhere in the world.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 219
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal pap smears: A meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia
    Arbyn, M
    Buntinx, F
    Van Ranst, M
    Paraskevaidis, E
    Martin-Hirsch, P
    Dillner, J
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2004, 96 (04): : 280 - 293
  • [2] *BETH WORKSH, 1992, ACTA CYTOL, V36, P273
  • [3] Biscotti CV, 1997, DIAGN CYTOPATHOL, V17, P326, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0339(199711)17:5<326::AID-DC4>3.0.CO
  • [4] 2-8
  • [5] Davey DD, 2000, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V124, P203
  • [6] *EUR COMM, 2007, IN PRESS EUR GUID QU
  • [7] The significance of benign endometrial cells in cervicovaginal smears
    Fadare, O
    Ghofrani, M
    Chacho, MS
    Parkash, V
    [J]. ADVANCES IN ANATOMIC PATHOLOGY, 2005, 12 (05) : 274 - 287
  • [8] Terms without borders: An international approach to terminology
    Herbert, A
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2005, 33 (05) : 352 - 355
  • [9] BSCC terminology for cervical cytology: two or three tiers? Why not five, seven or even 14?
    Herbert, A
    [J]. CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2004, 15 (05) : 245 - 251
  • [10] BSCC, Bethesda or other? Terminology in cervical cytology European panel discussion
    Kocjan, G
    Priollet, BC
    Desai, M
    Koutselini, H
    Mahovlic, V
    Oliveira, MH
    Pohar-Marinsek, Z
    Sauer, T
    Schenk, U
    Shabalova, I
    Herbert, A
    [J]. CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2005, 16 (03) : 113 - 119