Concurrent evolution of resistance and tolerance to pathogens

被引:182
作者
Restif, O [1 ]
Koella, JC [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris 07, UMR 7103, CNRS, Lab Parasitol Evolut, F-75252 Paris 05, France
关键词
ESS model; parasite; recovery; cost; trade-off;
D O I
10.1086/423713
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Recent experiments on plant defenses against pathogens or herbivores have shown various patterns of the association between resistance, which reduces the probability of being infected or attacked, and tolerance, which reduces the loss of fitness caused by the infection or attack. Our study describes the simultaneous evolution of these two strategies of defense in a population of hosts submitted to a pathogen. We extended previous approaches by assuming that the two traits are independent ( e. g., determined by two unlinked genes), by modeling different shapes of the costs of defenses, and by taking into account the demographic and epidemiological dynamics of the system. We provide novel predictions on the variability and the evolution of defenses. First, resistance and tolerance do not necessarily exclude each other; second, they should respond in different ways to changes in parameters that affect the epidemiology or the relative costs and benefits of defenses; and third, when comparing investments in defenses among different environments, the apparent associations among resistance, tolerance, and fecundity in the absence of parasites can lead to the false conclusion that only one defense trait is costly. The latter result emphasizes the problems of estimating trade-offs and costs among natural populations without knowledge of the underlying mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:E90 / E102
页数:13
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Overcompensation of plants in response to herbivory and the by-product benefits of mutualism [J].
Agrawal, AA .
TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2000, 5 (07) :309-313
[2]   COEVOLUTION OF HOSTS AND PARASITES [J].
ANDERSON, RM ;
MAY, RM .
PARASITOLOGY, 1982, 85 (OCT) :411-426
[3]   THE POPULATION-DYNAMICS OF MICRO-PARASITES AND THEIR INVERTEBRATE HOSTS [J].
ANDERSON, RM ;
MAY, RM .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1981, 291 (1054) :451-524
[4]   WITHIN-HOST POPULATION-DYNAMICS AND THE EVOLUTION AND MAINTENANCE OF MICROPARASITE VIRULENCE [J].
ANTIA, R ;
LEVIN, BR ;
MAY, RM .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1994, 144 (03) :457-472
[5]   Surveying patterns in the cost of resistance in plants [J].
Bergelson, J ;
Purrington, CB .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1996, 148 (03) :536-558
[6]   The evolution of costly resistance in host-parasite systems [J].
Boots, M ;
Haraguchi, Y .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1999, 153 (04) :359-370
[7]   Three mechanisms of host resistance to microparasites - Avoidance, recovery and tolerance - Show different evolutionary dynamics [J].
Boots, M ;
Bowers, RG .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1999, 201 (01) :13-23
[8]   Parent-offspring regression suggests heritable susceptibility to ectoparasites in a natural population of kittiwake Rissa tridactyla [J].
Boulinier, T ;
Sorci, G ;
Monnat, JY ;
Danchin, E .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 1997, 10 (01) :77-85
[9]  
Carius HJ, 2001, EVOLUTION, V55, P1136, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00633.x
[10]   Resistance to xenobiotics and parasites: can we count the cost? [J].
Coustau, C ;
Chevillon, C ;
ffrench-Constant, R .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2000, 15 (09) :378-383