Knowledge relatedness and the performance of multibusiness firms

被引:451
作者
Tanriverdi, H
Venkatraman, N
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Red McCombs Sch Business, MSIS Dept, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Sch Management, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
corporate diversification strategy; knowledge synergy; relatedness; complementarity; survey methodology; structural equation modeling; second-order construct;
D O I
10.1002/smj.435
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study examines corporate performance effects of cross-business knowledge synergies in multibusiness firms. It synthesizes the resource-based view of diversification and the economic theory of complementarities to conceptualize cross-business knowledge synergies in terms of the relatedness and the complementarity of knowledge resources across business units of the multibusiness firm. The study hypothesizes that corporate performance is improved when the firm simultaneously exploits a complementary set of related knowledge resources across its business units. It? a sample of 303 multibusiness firms, the study finds that synergies arising from product knowledge relatedness, customer knowledge relatedness, or managerial knowledge relatedness do not improve corporate performance on their own. Synergies arising from the complementarity of the three types of knowledge relatedness significantly improve both market-based and accounting-based performance of the multibusiness corporation. Copyright (C) 2004 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 119
页数:23
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1974, Strategy, structure and economic performance
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, MANAGING MODULAR AGE
[3]   MODERATOR VARIABLES - A CLARIFICATION OF CONCEPTUAL, ANALYTIC, AND PSYCHOMETRIC ISSUES [J].
ARNOLD, HJ .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1982, 29 (02) :143-174
[4]   REPRESENTING AND TESTING ORGANIZATIONAL THEORIES - A HOLISTIC CONSTRUAL [J].
BAGOZZI, RP ;
PHILLIPS, LW .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1982, 27 (03) :459-489
[5]   ASSESSING CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY IN ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH [J].
BAGOZZI, RP ;
LI, YJ ;
PHILLIPS, LW .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1991, 36 (03) :421-458
[6]   DIVERSIFICATIONS EFFECT ON FIRM VALUE [J].
BERGER, PG ;
OFEK, E .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 37 (01) :39-65
[7]   RISK RETURN PERFORMANCE OF DIVERSIFIED FIRMS [J].
BETTIS, RA ;
MAHAJAN, V .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1985, 31 (07) :785-799
[8]  
Byrne B.M., 1998, Multivariate applications book series. Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications
[9]   Explaining the diversification discount [J].
Campa, JM ;
Kedia, S .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2002, 57 (04) :1731-1762
[10]   Redeployment of brands, sales forces, and general marketing management expertise following horizontal acquisitions: A resource-based view [J].
Capron, L ;
Hulland, J .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1999, 63 (02) :41-54