On measuring individual knowledge in organizations

被引:26
作者
Borgatti, Stephen P. [1 ]
Carboni, Inga [1 ]
机构
[1] Boston Coll, Carroll Sch Business, Chestnut Hill, MA 02167 USA
关键词
knowledge; measurement; consensus;
D O I
10.1177/1094428107300228
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
How can knowledge held by individuals and groups be accurately measured when the a priori "right" answers are unknown? This article presents a promising new approach, based on anthropological consensus theory, to solving this common research problem. Using a unique data set, we compare the consensus approach with more traditional approaches (e.g., standardized testing). The results suggest that a consensus-based method may be a highly accurate way to estimate knowledge levels in a number of settings.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 462
页数:14
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, FOLKWAYS STUDY SOCIO
[2]  
[Anonymous], SITUATED LEARNING
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1990, BASICS QUALITATIVE R
[4]  
[Anonymous], ADV ED PSYCHOL TESTI
[5]  
Argyris C., 1974, THEORY PRACTICE
[6]  
Borgatti S. P., 1992, ANTHROPAC
[7]  
Burt RS., 1992, STRUCTURAL HOLES SOC
[8]   ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY - A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION [J].
COHEN, WM ;
LEVINTHAL, DA .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1990, 35 (01) :128-152
[9]   THE MINIMUM RESIDUAL METHOD OF FACTOR-ANALYSIS [J].
COMREY, AL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1962, 11 (01) :15-18
[10]  
EKSTROM RB, 1973, PR7330 ERIC, P111