Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of atherosclerotic internal carotid stenosis as the noninvasive imaging modality in revascularization decision making

被引:61
作者
Cosottini, M
Pingitore, A
Puglioli, M
Michelassi, MC
Lupi, G
Abbruzzese, A
Calabrese, R
Lombardi, M
Parenti, G
Bartolozzi, C
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Dept Neurosci, I-56100 Pisa, Italy
[2] Univ Pisa, Dept Radiol, I-56100 Pisa, Italy
[3] CNR, Inst Clin Physiol, I-56100 Pisa, Italy
[4] AO, Serv Neuroradiol, Pisa, Italy
关键词
carotid arteries; carotid endarterectomy; comparative study; magnetic resonance angiography;
D O I
10.1161/01.STR.0000057462.02141.6F
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose-In patients with severe internal carotid artery stenoses, thromboendarterectomy significantly reduces both ischemic stroke and the risk of more ischemic attacks. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the accepted preoperative test to determine whether a high-grade stenosis is present and requires surgical therapy. However, DSA has a procedural risk of stroke between 0.7% and 1%. An accurate, noninvasive imaging protocol with no risk of severe complications would significantly increase the benefit of surgical treatment. The aims of the study were (1) to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CEMRA) in detecting and grading internal carotid artery stenoses and (2) to assess the misclassification rate of vessels suitable for revascularization by CEMRA. Methods-Ninety-two patients with sonographic evidence of neck vessel stenosis were enrolled in the study. All patients were submitted to CEMRA and DSA. CEMRA images were evaluated for the presence of mild, moderate, or severe stenosis and occlusion. Results-Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were 97%, 82%, and 92.5%, respectively. Agreement with DSA was optimal at kappa=0.87. The misclassification rate of CEMRA was 3.1% because of its tendency to overestimate the stenosis. Conclusions-The high diagnostic accuracy and limited misclassification rate suggest that CEMRA can be considered a powerful tool for the preoperative, noninvasive evaluation of atherosclerotic pathology of carotid arteries.
引用
收藏
页码:660 / 664
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Barbier C, 2001, J RADIOL, V82, P245
[2]   Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis [J].
Barnett, HJM ;
Taylor, W ;
Eliasziw, M ;
Fox, AJ ;
Ferguson, GG ;
Haynes, RB ;
Rankin, RN ;
Clagett, GP ;
Hachinski, VC ;
Sackett, DL ;
Thorpe, KE ;
Meldrum, HE ;
Spence, JD .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (20) :1415-1425
[3]  
Bernstein MA, 2001, MAGNET RESON MED, V46, P955, DOI 10.1002/mrm.1282
[4]  
Biller J, 1998, CIRCULATION, V97, P501
[5]   Clinical and radiographic risk factors for operative stroke and death in the European Carotid Surgery Trial [J].
Bond, R ;
Narayan, SK ;
Rothwell, PM ;
Warlow, CP .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 23 (02) :108-116
[6]   Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography in the assessment of subclavian artery diseases [J].
Cosottini, M ;
Zampa, V ;
Petruzzi, P ;
Ortori, S ;
Cioni, R ;
Bartolozzi, C .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (11) :1737-1744
[7]   MR-based assessment of vascular morphology and function [J].
Debatin, JF ;
Hany, TF .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1998, 8 (04) :528-539
[8]   Multidirectional depiction of internal carotid arterial stenosis:: Three-dimensional time-of-might MR angiography versus rotational and conventional digital subtraction angiography [J].
Elgersma, OEH ;
Wüst, AFJ ;
Buijs, PC ;
van der Graaf, Y ;
Eikelboom, BC ;
Mali, WPTM .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 216 (02) :511-516
[9]  
FALK E, 1992, CIRCULATION, V86, P30
[10]   Fluoroscopically triggered contrast-enhanced 3D MR DSA and 3D time-of-flight turbo MRA of the carotid arteries: first clinical experiences in correlation with ultrasound, x-ray angiography, and endarterectomy findings [J].
Fellner, FA ;
Fellner, C ;
Wutke, R ;
Lang, W ;
Laub, G ;
Schmidt, M ;
Janka, R ;
Denzel, C ;
Bautz, W .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2000, 18 (05) :575-585