Changing socioeconomic inequality in infant mortality in Cumbria

被引:8
作者
Dummer, TJB
Parker, L
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Royal Victoria Infirm, Sir James Spence Inst Child Hlth, Paediat & Lifecourse Epidemiol Res Grp, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 4LP, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Sch Social Sci, Liverpool L3 5UX, Merseyside, England
关键词
D O I
10.1136/adc.2003.036111
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Aims: To investigate infant deaths in Cumbria, 1950-93, in relation to individual and community level socioeconomic status. Methods: Retrospective birth cohort study of all 283 668 live births and 4889 infant deaths in Cumbria, 1950-93. Community deprivation (Townsend score) and individual social class were used to estimate socioeconomic status. Logistic regression was used to investigate risk of infant death (early neonatal, neonatal, and postneonatal) in relation to social class and Townsend deprivation score, adjusting for year of birth, birth order, multiple births, and stratified by time period, 1950-65, 1966-75, 1976-85, 1986-93. Results: The risk of infant death in all categories was higher in the lower social classes and more deprived communities, although inequality in risk of neonatal death declined after 1975 to such an extent that there was no significant difference in neonatal death rates by socioeconomic status in the most recent time period. By contrast, there was no narrowing in socioeconomic inequality in postneonatal death risk over the study period. Community deprivation was associated with a significant increased risk of postneonatal death after adjusting for individual level socioeconomic status. Conclusions: Postneonatal deaths remain higher in the most deprived communities and in the more disadvantaged social classes. The social, lifestyle, and environmental determinates of adverse health outcomes for children need to be fully understood, and interventions should be designed and targeted at the more socially deprived sectors of our community.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 162
页数:6
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   A NEW HIERARCHICAL-CLASSIFICATION OF CAUSES OF INFANT DEATHS IN ENGLAND AND WALES [J].
ALBERMAN, E ;
BOTTING, B ;
BLATCHLEY, N ;
TWIDELL, A .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 1994, 70 (05) :403-409
[2]  
[Anonymous], BIRTH COUNTS STAT PR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1988, HLTH DEPRIVATION INE
[4]   Marital status as a risk factor for fetal and infant mortality [J].
Arntzen, A ;
Moum, T ;
Magnus, P ;
Bakketeig, LS .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL MEDICINE, 1996, 24 (01) :36-42
[5]  
Botting B, 1997, HLTH INEQUALITIES
[6]  
BOTTING B, 1995, HLTH OUR CHILDREN DE
[7]   Is there a place for geography in the analysis of health inequality? [J].
Curtis, S ;
Jones, IR .
SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS, 1998, 20 (05) :645-672
[8]  
DAVEYSMITH G, 2000, BRIT MED J, V320, P582
[9]  
*DOH, 1998, IND INQ INEQ HLTH AC
[10]   Measuring disadvantage: Changes in the underprivileged area, Townsend, and Carstairs scores 1981-91 [J].
Dolan, SA ;
Jarman, B ;
Bajekal, M ;
Davies, PM ;
Hart, D .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1995, 49 :S30-S33