Peer Reviewing Across the Atlantic: Patterns and Trends in L1 and L2 Comments Made in an Asynchronous Online Collaborative Learning Exchange Between Technical Communication Students in Sweden and in the United States

被引:16
作者
Anderson, Paul [1 ]
Bergman, Becky
Bradley, Linda
Gustafsson, Magnus [2 ]
Matzke, Aurora [1 ]
机构
[1] Miami Univ, Howe Ctr Writing Excellence, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
[2] Chalmers Univ Technol, Ctr Language & Commun, Dept Appl Informat Technol, S-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
globally networked learning environment; peer reviewing; second-language instruction; technical communication; intercultural communication; CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK; CLASSROOM; GERMAN;
D O I
10.1177/1050651910363270
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In a globally networked learning environment (GNLE), 16 students at a university in Sweden and 17 students at a university in the United States exchanged peer-review comments on drafts of assignments they prepared in English for their technical communication classes. The instructors of both sets of students had assigned the same projects and taught their courses in the same way that they had in the previous year, which contrasts with the common practice of having students in partnering courses work on the same assignment or on linked assignments created specifically for the GNLE. The authors coded the students' 816 comments according to their focus and orientation in order to investigate the possible differences between the comments made by the L2 students in Sweden and those made by the L1 (English as a second language) students in the United States, the possible impact of peer reviewing online, and the influence of the instructors' directions on the students' peer-reviewing behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 322
页数:27
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
*AM ASS COLL U, 2009, GEN ED GLOB LEARN
[2]  
Anderson P., 2007, TECHNICAL COMMUNICAT, V6th
[3]  
[Anonymous], CHRONICLE HIGHER ED
[4]  
[Anonymous], SUNY CTR ONL COLL LE
[5]  
[Anonymous], WRITING MILIEU UTILI
[6]  
Artemeva N., 2003, LANGUAGE LEARNING DI, V6, P62
[7]  
BATT TA, 2005, RHETORIC REV, V42, P207
[8]  
Beach R., 2006, HDB WRITING RES, P222
[9]   Evidence in support of written corrective feedback [J].
Bitchener, John .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2008, 17 (02) :102-118
[10]   The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback [J].
Bitchener, John ;
Knoch, Ute .
ELT JOURNAL, 2009, 63 (03) :204-211