Measuring the recreational value of agricultural landscape

被引:73
作者
Fleischer, A
Tsur, Y
机构
[1] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Dept Agr Econ & Management, IL-76100 Rehovot, Israel
[2] Univ Minnesota, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
关键词
agricultural landscape; recreation; travel cost; farmland;
D O I
10.1093/erae/27.3.385
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
In addition to food and fibre, agricultural land provides public amenities in the form of wildlife habitat, protection of natural resources, open spaces, aesthetic scenery and cultural preservation. Most previous studies have used contingent valuation methods to measure the value of these services. We use an alternative procedure, which provides a value of the agricultural landscape per se, as measured against a specific alternative, and is based on whether agricultural landscape had an influence on visitation decisions. Our procedure involves a travel cost model estimated by count-data regression techniques using (truncated) samples of visitors. An application to two regions in Israel reveals a substantial value for agricultural landscape, as compared with the traditional returns to farming.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 398
页数:14
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   The challenge of farmland preservation - Lessons from a six-nation comparison [J].
Alterman, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 1997, 63 (02) :220-243
[2]  
Arrow K., 1993, FED REGISTER, V58, P4601
[3]  
Bromley D. W., 1990, European Review of Agricultural Economics, V17, P197, DOI 10.1093/erae/17.2.197
[4]  
BROMLEY DW, 1994, OECD C RUR AM PAR
[5]   COMBINING CONTINGENT VALUATION AND TRAVEL COST DATA FOR THE VALUATION OF NONMARKET GOODS [J].
CAMERON, TA .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1992, 68 (03) :302-317
[6]  
Clawson M., 1966, Economics of Outdoor Recreation
[7]  
COOKE R, 1997, CRN NEWS, V5, P114
[8]   CONTINGENT VALUATION - IS SOME NUMBER BETTER THAN NO NUMBER [J].
DIAMOND, PA ;
HAUSMAN, JA .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1994, 8 (04) :45-64
[9]  
DLAYAHU E, 1996, AGR SECTOR LONG TERM
[10]  
Drake L., 1992, European Review of Agricultural Economics, V19, P351, DOI 10.1093/erae/19.3.351