Elimination of the word length effect by irrelevant sound revisited

被引:12
作者
Tremblay, S [1 ]
Macken, WJ [1 ]
Jones, DM [1 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Sch Psychol, Cardiff CF1 3YG, S Glam, Wales
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03198419
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The word length effect refers to the tendency for lists of long words to be recalled less well than lists of short words. Theoretical and empirical objections are raised to a recent claim that irrelevant speech eliminates the word length effect (Neath, Suprenant, & LeCompte, 1998). A first experiment using a within-subjects design of adequate power (N = 65) fails to replicate their finding, showing instead that the word length effect is not differentially eliminated by speech as opposed to tones. In a second experiment, the effect of change (repeated vs. changing sounds) is shown to be additive to the effect of word length for both speech and nonspeech. Irrelevant speech and irrelevant tones have comparable effects on lists of short or Lists of long words. These results are at variance with the feature model (e.g., Nairne, 1990).
引用
收藏
页码:841 / 846
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   IS WORKING MEMORY WORKING - THE 15TH BARTLETT LECTURE [J].
BADDELEY, A .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 44 (01) :1-31
[2]  
Baddeley A., 1975, The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, V8, P47, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1
[3]   WORD LENGTH AND STRUCTURE OF SHORT-TERM-MEMORY [J].
BADDELEY, AD ;
THOMSON, N ;
BUCHANAN, M .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1975, 14 (06) :575-589
[4]   MODELING ITEM LENGTH EFFECTS IN MEMORY SPAN - NO REHEARSAL NEEDED [J].
BROWN, GDA ;
HULME, C .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1995, 34 (05) :594-621
[5]   ACOUSTIC MASKING IN PRIMARY MEMORY [J].
COLLE, HA ;
WELSH, A .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1976, 15 (01) :17-31
[6]   Output loss or rehearsal loop? Output-time versus pronunciation-time limits in immediate recall for forgetting-matched materials [J].
Dosher, BA ;
Ma, JJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1998, 24 (02) :316-335
[7]   Individual differences in susceptibility to the ''irrelevant speech effect'' [J].
Ellermeier, W ;
Zimmer, K .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1997, 102 (04) :2191-2199
[8]   Does articulatory suppression remove the irrelevant speech effect? [J].
Hanley, JR .
MEMORY, 1997, 5 (03) :423-431
[9]   THE EFFECT OF UNATTENDED SPEECH ON SERIAL-RECALL FOLLOWING AUDITORY PRESENTATION [J].
HANLEY, JR ;
BROADBENT, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 78 :287-297
[10]   Organizational factors in selective attention: The interplay of acoustic distinctiveness and auditory streaming in the irrelevant sound effect [J].
Jones, D ;
Alford, D ;
Bridges, A ;
Tremblay, S ;
Macken, B .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1999, 25 (02) :464-473