Observation of EEG coherence after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

被引:56
作者
Jing, HK [1 ]
Takigawa, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Kagoshima Univ, Fac Med, Dept Neuropsychiat, Kagoshima 8908520, Japan
关键词
coherence; directed; EEG; topography; magnetic stimulation;
D O I
10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00357-6
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The effects before and after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on EEG activity were investigated. Methods: Nineteen healthy subjects received two trains (10 Hz, 100% of motor threshold, 3 s/train) of rTMS to the left frontal area. Directed coherence and ordinary coherence were calculated from EEG epochs recorded before and after (1 similar to 3 and 3 similar to 5 min) rTMS. The results were compared and demonstrated on maps. Results: Directed coherence between cortical areas increased after rTMS (F = 5.62, P < 0.005), with the intra-hemispheric change being more pronounced than the inter-hemispheric change. Connections from the stimulated site to other sites were selectively reinforced. In contrast, ordinary coherence did not change after the stimulation. rTMS did not influence the dominant frequency at which maximal coherence was calculated. Differences in the directed coherence with opposite directions after rTMS were significantly correlated with the differences before rTMS (r = 0.88, 0.89, P < 0.001). Conclusions: (1) rTMS can enhance the connections between cortical areas, especially connections between the stimulated cortex and other sites in the brain. (2) Comparing with connections from the parietal area to frontal area, connections from the frontal area to parietal area are obviously improved by rTMS in both hemispheres. (3) The effects of rTMS can last for several minutes. Therefore, the necessity of EEG monitoring in rTMS studies is suggested. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1620 / 1631
页数:12
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION
    AKAIKE, H
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) : 716 - 723
  • [2] Safety of different inter-train intervals for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and recommendations for safe ranges of stimulation parameters
    Chen, R
    Gerloff, C
    Classen, J
    Wassermann, EM
    Hallett, M
    Cohen, LG
    [J]. ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND MOTOR CONTROL-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 105 (06): : 415 - 421
  • [3] EPILEPTIC SEIZURES TRIGGERED DIRECTLY BY FOCAL TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION
    CLASSEN, J
    WITTE, OW
    SCHLAUG, G
    SEITZ, RJ
    HOLTHAUSEN, H
    BENECKE, R
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 94 (01): : 19 - 25
  • [4] EFFECTS OF COIL DESIGN ON DELIVERY OF FOCAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION - TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS
    COHEN, LG
    ROTH, BJ
    NILSSON, J
    DANG, N
    PANIZZA, M
    BANDINELLI, S
    FRIAUF, W
    HALLETT, M
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 75 (04): : 350 - 357
  • [5] Corthout E, 1999, NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, V37, P137
  • [6] TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION IN PATIENTS WITH EPILEPSY
    DHUNA, A
    GATES, J
    PASCUALLEONE, A
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 1991, 41 (07) : 1067 - 1071
  • [7] OBJECTIVE DETECTION OF 40-HZ AUDITORY-EVOKED POTENTIALS - PHASE COHERENCE VS MAGNITUDE-SQUARED COHERENCE
    DOBIE, RA
    WILSON, MJ
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 92 (05): : 405 - 413
  • [8] OBJECTIVE RESPONSE DETECTION IN THE FREQUENCY-DOMAIN
    DOBIE, RA
    WILSON, MJ
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 88 (06): : 516 - 524
  • [9] SAFETY ASPECTS OF TRANSCRANIAL BRAIN-STIMULATION IN MAN TESTED BY SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
    DRESSLER, D
    VOTH, E
    FELDMANN, M
    BENECKE, R
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 1990, 119 (02) : 153 - 155
  • [10] SEIZURE INDUCTION AND MAGNETIC BRAIN-STIMULATION AFTER STROKE
    FAUTH, C
    MEYER, BU
    PROSIEGEL, M
    ZIHL, J
    CONRAD, B
    [J]. LANCET, 1992, 339 (8789) : 362 - 362