Environmentalism and risk perception: Empirical analysis of black and white differentials and convergence

被引:27
作者
Adeola, FO [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Orleans, Environm Social Sci Res Inst, Dept Sociol, New Orleans, LA 70148 USA
关键词
cognized environment; discriminant analysis; ecological and technological risks; environmental inequity; environmentalism; general social survey (GSS); LULUs; popular environmentalism; risk society;
D O I
10.1080/08941920490505329
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This study employs nationally representative data to assess the similarities and differences between Blacks and Whites on measures of environmentalism and risk attitudes in the United States. Theoretically guided hypotheses were formulated and tested. Discriminant analysis of the General Social Survey (GSS) and International Social Survey Program (ISSP) data was conducted using three major themes or modules of environmentalism and risk aversion. The results indicate that Blacks are as concerned as or even more concerned than Whites in terms of general environmental attitudes. Whites, however, exhibit higher scores relative to Blacks on attitudes toward economic aspects of proenvironmental behavior or behavioral orientations. Blacks are more inclined than Whites to favor increasing government spending on environmental protection and are relatively more concerned about environmental problems. While there are some points of agreement, these racial groups exhibit dissimilar environmentalism and risk avoiding behaviors on several measures. White respondents scored significantly lower on risk perception and attitudes toward technological and environmental risks relative to their Black counterparts. Methodological and theoretical implications of these findings are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:911 / 939
页数:29
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   Endangered community enduring people - Toxic contamination, health, and adaptive responses in a local context [J].
Adeola, FO .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2000, 32 (02) :209-249
[2]   Cross-national environmentalism differentials: Empirical evidence from core and noncore nations [J].
Adeola, FO .
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 1998, 11 (04) :339-364
[3]  
Adeola FO., 2004, HUMAN ECOL REV, V11, P27
[4]  
ADEOLA FO, 2002, WASTE ECOLOGICAL EC, P146
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, LAND COULD BE ENV DE
[6]   THE PERSONAL THREAT OF ENVIRONMENTAL-PROBLEMS AS PREDICTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL PRACTICES [J].
BALDASSARE, M ;
KATZ, C .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 1992, 24 (05) :602-616
[7]  
Beck U., 1995, ECOLOGICAL ENLIGHTEN
[8]  
Beck Ulrich., 1992, RISK SOC
[9]  
Blocker TJ, 1997, SOC SCI QUART, V78, P841
[10]  
BRAUD KW, 1997, INT HDB ENV SOCIOLOG, P504