Complementarity-based conservation prioritization using a community classification, and its application to riverine ecosystems

被引:61
作者
Leathwick, J. R. [1 ]
Moilanen, A. [2 ]
Ferrier, S. [3 ]
Julian, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Water & Atmospher Res, Hamilton, New Zealand
[2] Univ Helsinki, Dept Biol & Environm Sci, Metapopulat Res Grp, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[3] CSIRO Entomol, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Community dissimilarity; Complementarity; Conservation planning; Environmental classification; Riverine ecosystems; Zonation software; NEW-SOUTH-WALES; PROTECTED AREAS; ENVIRONMENTAL DIVERSITY; BIODIVERSITY; SURROGATE; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2010.01.012
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
We demonstrate a novel method for spatial conservation prioritization at a community-level that takes account of: (i) an environmentally-based classification of the landscape into community classes; (ii) similarities between community classes to allow for community complementarity-based selection; (iii) variation in species richness. (iv) variation in human impacts on ecological integrity; and (v) requirements for maintenance of upstream-downstream connectivity in riverine systems While this technique has generic application, we demonstrate its application using a biologically-trained environmental classification of New Zealand's river network. Our analysis produces a priority ranking of planning units (here 4th order catchments or sub-catchments) and performance estimates in terms of expected biodiversity returns given varying degrees of geographic protection Accounting for community similarity ensures high protection for distinct habitat classes with low similarity to other classes; our results indicate a 28% loss in conservation efficiency of the highest-ranked 10% of the landscape if it is ignored. Accounting for human pressures and connectivity also had clear influences on spatial priority rankings, indicating the need to consider these factors in the conservation planning process (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:984 / 991
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Unlocking the potential of protected areas for freshwaters [J].
Abell, Robin ;
Allan, J. David ;
Lehner, Bernhard .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2007, 134 (01) :48-63
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Spatial conservation prioritization: quantitative methods and computational tools
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, ZONATION SPATIAL CON
[4]   Would environmental diversity be a good surrogate for species diversity? [J].
Araújo, MB ;
Humphries, CJ ;
Densham, PJ ;
Lampinen, R ;
Hagemeijer, WJM ;
Mitchell-Jones, AJ ;
Gasc, JP .
ECOGRAPHY, 2001, 24 (01) :103-110
[5]   A successful community-level strategy for conservation prioritization [J].
Arponen, Anni ;
Moilanen, Atte ;
Ferrier, Simon .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2008, 45 (05) :1436-1445
[6]   Global biodiversity conservation priorities [J].
Brooks, T. M. ;
Mittermeier, R. A. ;
da Fonseca, G. A. B. ;
Gerlach, J. ;
Hoffmann, M. ;
Lamoreux, J. F. ;
Mittermeier, C. G. ;
Pilgrim, J. D. ;
Rodrigues, A. S. L. .
SCIENCE, 2006, 313 (5783) :58-61
[7]   Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity [J].
Brooks, TM ;
Mittermeier, RA ;
Mittermeier, CG ;
da Fonseca, GAB ;
Rylands, AB ;
Konstant, WR ;
Flick, P ;
Pilgrim, J ;
Oldfield, S ;
Magin, G ;
Hilton-Taylor, C .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2002, 16 (04) :909-923
[8]   Environmental diversity: On the best-possible use of surrogate data for assessing the relative biodiversity of sets of areas [J].
Faith, DP ;
Walker, PA .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 1996, 5 (04) :399-415
[9]  
Ferrier S, 2004, BIOSCIENCE, V54, P1101, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[1101:MMOTBF]2.0.CO
[10]  
2