Shifting Liberal and Conservative Attitudes Using Moral Foundations Theory

被引:157
作者
Day, Martin V. [1 ]
Fiske, Susan T. [1 ]
Downing, Emily L. [2 ]
Trail, Thomas E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] Microsoft, Seattle, WA USA
[3] RAND Corp, Arlington, VA USA
关键词
morality; moral foundations; ideology; attitudes; politics; MOTIVATED SKEPTICISM; MECHANICAL TURK; REGULATORY FIT; PERSUASION; PROTECTION; COGNITION; THOUGHT; MODEL; BIAS;
D O I
10.1177/0146167214551152
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
People's social and political opinions are grounded in their moral concerns about right and wrong. We examine whether five moral foundationsharm, fairness, ingroup, authority, and puritycan influence political attitudes of liberals and conservatives across a variety of issues. Framing issues using moral foundations may change political attitudes in at least two possible ways: (a) Entrenching: Relevant moral foundations will strengthen existing political attitudes when framing pro-attitudinal issues (e.g., conservatives exposed to a free-market economic stance) and (b) Persuasion: Mere presence of relevant moral foundations may also alter political attitudes in counter-attitudinal directions (e.g., conservatives exposed to an economic regulation stance). Studies 1 and 2 support the entrenching hypothesis. Relevant moral foundation-based frames bolstered political attitudes for conservatives (Study 1) and liberals (Study 2). Only Study 2 partially supports the persuasion hypothesis. Conservative-relevant moral frames of liberal issues increased conservatives' liberal attitudes.
引用
收藏
页码:1559 / 1573
页数:15
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Moral politics. How liberals and conservatives think
[2]  
[Anonymous], J PERS SOC PSYCHOL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Ideological consistency across the political spectrum: Liberals are more consistent but conservatives become more consistent when coping with existential threat
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, The Righteous Mind Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion
[5]   Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions [J].
Bartels, LM .
POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2002, 24 (02) :117-150
[6]   Justice-based opposition to social policies: Is it genuine? [J].
Bobocel, DR ;
Hing, LSS ;
Davey, LM ;
Stanley, DJ ;
Zanna, MP .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 75 (03) :653-669
[7]   Political mindset: Effects of schema priming on liberal-conservative political positions [J].
Bryan, Christopher J. ;
Dweck, Carol S. ;
Ross, Lee ;
Kay, Aaron C. ;
Mislavsky, Natalia O. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 45 (04) :890-895
[8]   Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data? [J].
Buhrmester, Michael ;
Kwang, Tracy ;
Gosling, Samuel D. .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 6 (01) :3-5
[9]   Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from "feeling right" [J].
Cesario, J ;
Grant, H ;
Higgins, ET .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 86 (03) :388-404
[10]  
Cialdini R.B., 2008, INFLUENCE SCI PRACTI, V5th