Topping up or opting out? The optimal design of public provision schemes

被引:26
作者
Blomquist, S [1 ]
Christiansen, V
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Univ Oslo, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
关键词
D O I
10.2307/2527299
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
There is extensive public provision of private goods in all developed countries. The public provision scheme is often designed so that individuals can opt out, but not top up (supplement) the publicly provided quantity/quality. Using an optimal income tax/public provision model we derive the respective conditions under which a public provision scheme should allow or forbid supplementing. Disregarding administrative costs, a system where individuals are not allowed to top up is optimal if the demand for the publicly provided good increases in the amount of leisure available, while a scheme allowing individuals to top up is warranted if the demand decreases with the amount of leisure.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 411
页数:13
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, EUR J POLIT ECON, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0176-2680(96)00009-2
[2]  
BESLEY T, 1991, AM ECON REV, V81, P979
[3]   WELFARE IMPROVING USER CHARGES FOR PUBLICLY PROVIDED PRIVATE GOODS [J].
BESLEY, T .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1991, 93 (04) :495-510
[4]  
BLACKORBY C, 1988, AM ECON REV, V78, P691
[5]   Public provision of private goods as a redistributive device in an optimum income tax model [J].
Blomquist, S ;
Christiansen, V .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1995, 97 (04) :547-567
[6]  
BLOMQUIST S, 1994, 26 UPPS U DEP EC
[7]   PUBLIC-GOODS, SELF-SELECTION AND OPTIMAL INCOME TAXATION [J].
BOADWAY, R ;
KEEN, M .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1993, 34 (03) :463-478
[8]   THE USE OF PUBLIC-EXPENDITURES FOR REDISTRIBUTIVE PURPOSES [J].
BOADWAY, R ;
MARCHAND, M .
OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES, 1995, 47 (01) :45-59
[9]  
Edwards J., 1994, FINANZARCHIV, V51, P472
[10]   IN-KIND VERSUS CASH TRANSFERS IN THE PRESENCE OF DISTORTIONARY TAXES [J].
GAHVARI, F .
ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 1995, 33 (01) :45-53