Mg-Gluconate provides superior protection against postischemic dysfunction and oxidative injury compared to Mg-sulfate

Cardioprotection by Mg Sulfate (MgSO4) during ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) is attributed largely to the Mg2+ cation. However, Mg-gluconate (MgGl(2)) may provide added benefit, possibly through its anion's antioxidant properties. Protective effects of both Mg-salts and their anions during 30 min global I and 50 min R were assessed in Langendorff-perfused (Krebs-Henseleit buffer) rat hearts. Recovery of function was compared between untreated hearts and those receiving supplement (2.4 mM MgGl(2), MgSO4, or Na2SO4, or 4.8 mM NaGl) for 5 min prior to I and during the initial 30 min R. The final 20 min R was conducted without supplement. End diastolic pressure (EDP, mmHg) of the 50 min reperfused MgGl(2) group (2.6) was lower than MgSO4 (16.2) and untreated (35.6) groups, and the NaGl group (25.2) was considerably lower than Na2SO4 (38.8). Recovery of developed pressure (% preischemic DP) at the onset of R for MgGl(2) (74.9) was greater than MgSO4 (37.9) and untreated (33.2). After 50 min, MgGl(2) (77.9) and MgSO4 (66.9) provided protection compared to untreated (51.8). In separate studies, ESR spin trapping with alpha-phenyl-N-tert-butylnitrone (3 mM PBN) showed that I/R alkoxyl radical production was reduced with MgGl(2) (0.0 vs. 2.4 vs. 3.6 mM: 184 vs. 97 vs. 54.8 nM/g tissue x min) to a greater extent than seen with MgSO4 (3.6 mM: 108). Additional studies suggest that Gl(1-), unlike SO42-, may scavenge hydroxyl radicals, accounting for the added protection. MgGl(2) treated hearts exhibited less postischemic dysfunction and oxidative injury compared to MgSO4, suggesting the contribution of Gl(1-) to cardioprotection.