Neural network approach to the segmentation and classification of dynamic magnetic resonance images of the breast:: Comparison with empiric and quantitative kinetic parameters

被引:29
作者
Szabó, BK [1 ]
Aspelin, P [1 ]
Wiberg, MK [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Karolinska Inst, Surg Sci Ctr, Div Diagnost Radiol, S-14186 Huddinge, Sweden
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; breast neoplasms; artificial neural networks; image segmentation;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2004.09.006
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objective. An artificial neural network (ANN)-based segmentation method was developed for dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the breast and compared with quantitative and empiric parameter mapping techniques. Materials and Methods. The study population was composed of 10 patients with seven malignant and three benign lesions undergoing dynamic MR imaging of the breast. All lesions were biopsied or surgically excised, and examined by means of histopathology. A T1-weighted 3D FLASH (fast low angle shot sequence) was acquired before and seven times after the intravenous administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg body weight. Motion artifacts on MR images were eliminated by voxel-based affine and nonrigid registration techniques. A two-layered feed-forward back-propagation network was created for pixel-by-pixel classification of signal intensity-time curves into benign/malignant tissue types. ANN output was statistically compared with percent-enhancement (E), signal enhancement ratio (SER), time-to-peak, subtracted signal intensity (SUB), pharmacokinetic parameter rate constant (k(ep)), and correlation coefficient to a predefined reference washout curve. Results. ANN was successfully applied to the classification of breast MR images identifying structures with benign or malignant enhancement kinetics. Correlation coefficient (logistic regression, odds ratio [OR] = 12.9; 95% Cl: 7.7-21.8), k(ep) (OR = 1.8; 95% Cl: 1.2-2.6), and time-to-peak (OR = 0.45; 95% Cl: 0.3-0.7) were independently associated to ANN output classes. SER, E, and SUB were nonsignificant covariates. Conclusion. ANN is capable of classifying breast lesions on MR images. Mapping correlation coefficient, k(ep) and time-to-peak showed the highest association with the ANN result.
引用
收藏
页码:1344 / 1354
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Feature extraction and classification of breast cancer on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging using artificial neural network [J].
Abdolmaleki, P ;
Buadu, LD ;
Naderimansh, H .
CANCER LETTERS, 2001, 171 (02) :183-191
[2]   Use of an artificial neural network to determine the diagnostic value of specific clinical and radiologic parameters in the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease on chest radiographs [J].
Abe, H ;
Ashizawa, K ;
Katsuragawa, S ;
MacMahon, H ;
Doi, K .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2002, 9 (01) :13-17
[3]   PROCESSING STRATEGIES FOR TIME-COURSE DATA SETS IN FUNCTIONAL MRI OF THE HUMAN BRAIN [J].
BANDETTINI, PA ;
JESMANOWICZ, A ;
WONG, EC ;
HYDE, JS .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1993, 30 (02) :161-173
[4]  
Beier J, 1998, RADIOLOGE, V38, P832, DOI 10.1007/s001170050431
[5]   New subtraction algorithms for evaluation of lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR mammography [J].
Choi, BG ;
Kim, HH ;
Kim, EN ;
Kim, BS ;
Han, JY ;
Yoo, SS ;
Park, SH .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (12) :3018-3022
[6]   MRI SEGMENTATION - METHODS AND APPLICATIONS [J].
CLARKE, LP ;
VELTHUIZEN, RP ;
CAMACHO, MA ;
HEINE, JJ ;
VAIDYANATHAN, M ;
HALL, LO ;
THATCHER, RW ;
SILBIGER, ML .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1995, 13 (03) :343-368
[7]   Breast disease: Dynamic spiral MR imaging [J].
Daniel, BL ;
Yen, YF ;
Glover, GH ;
Ikeda, DM ;
Birdwell, RL ;
Sawyer-Glover, AM ;
Black, JW ;
Plevritis, SK ;
Jeffrey, SS ;
Herfkens, RJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 209 (02) :499-509
[8]  
Dayhoff JE, 2001, CANCER, V91, P1615, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20010415)91:8+<1615::AID-CNCR1175>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-L
[10]   Image processing with neural networks - a review [J].
Egmont-Petersen, M ;
de Ridder, D ;
Handels, H .
PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2002, 35 (10) :2279-2301