Dynamic and static approaches to quantifying 18F-FDG uptake for measuring cancer response to therapy, including the effect of granulocyte CSF

被引:57
作者
Doot, Robert K.
Dunnwald, Lisa K.
Schubert, Erin K.
Muzi, Mark
Peterson, Lanell M.
Kinahan, Paul E.
Kurland, Brenda F.
Mankoff, David A.
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Bioengn, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Div Nucl Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Div Clin Res, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
关键词
SUV; MRFDG; F-18-FDG; granulocyte CSF; response to therapy;
D O I
10.2967/jnumed.106.037382
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The response of cancer to chemotherapy can be quantified using F-18-FDG to indicate changes in tumor metabolism. Quantification using the standardized uptake value (SUV) is more feasible for clinical practice than is the metabolic rate of F-18-FDG (MRFDG), which requires longer, dynamic scanning. The relationship between MRFDG and SUV depends in part on how each accounts for blood clearance of tracer. We tested whether chemotherapy and treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (CSF) changed the blood clearance curves and therefore affected the relationship between MRFDG and SUV. Methods: Thirty-nine patients with locally advanced breast cancer underwent F-18-FDG PET before and after chemotherapy, including granulocyte CSF. The area under the curve (AUC) for blood clearance was determined before and after therapy. MRFDGs were determined by graphical analyses, whereas SUVs were calculated using the standard formula normalized by body weight. MRFDG and SUVs were compared with each other and with tumor response. Paired percentage changes in MRFDG and SUV were also divided into tertiles based on pretherapy SUV to investigate differences in the relative sensitivity of SUV changes to MRFDG changes due to baseline tumor uptake. Results: Despite a small but statistically significant 6% decrease in blood AUCs after therapy (P = 0.02), SUV and MRFDG did not differ significantly in slope (P = 0.53) or in correlation before and after therapy (r = 0.95 for both). Percentage changes in MRFDG and SUV between serial scans correlated with each other (r = 0.84) and with patient response (P +/- 0.06). The maximum detectable percentage change in SUV and the slope of percentage changes in MRFDG versus SUV for the patient tertile with the lowest baseline SUVs (65% 5% [+/- SE], slope (m) = 0.40 +/- 0.12, n = 13) were significantly lower than for the other patients (86% 3%, m = 0.85 +/- 0.10, n = 26, P = 0.01 for both). Conclusion: Chemotherapy and granulocyte CSF treatment resulted in a lower F-18-FDG blood AUC. The maximum detectable percentage change in F-18-FDG uptake is less when quantifying via static SUV than via dynamic MRFDG. This effect is small in most patients but may have clinical significance for measuring the response of patients with a low pretherapy (18)FFDG uptake.
引用
收藏
页码:920 / 925
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[2]   Dose-dense anthracycline-based chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer [J].
Ellis, GK ;
Livingston, RB ;
Gralow, JR ;
Green, SJ ;
Thompson, T .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (17) :3637-3643
[3]   Comparison of SUV and Patlak slope for monitoring of cancer therapy using serial PET scans [J].
Freedman, NMT ;
Sundaram, SK ;
Kurdziel, K ;
Carrasquillo, JA ;
Whatley, M ;
Carson, JM ;
Sellers, D ;
Libutti, SK ;
Yang, JC ;
Bacharach, SL .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2003, 30 (01) :46-53
[5]   Comparison of simplified quantitative analyses of FDG uptake [J].
Graham, MM ;
Peterson, LM ;
Hayward, RM .
NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 27 (07) :647-655
[6]  
Hoekstra CJ, 2002, J NUCL MED, V43, P1304
[7]  
Huang SC, 2000, NUCL MED BIOL, V27, P643
[8]  
Jacene HA, 2006, J NUCL MED, V47, P950
[9]  
KEYES JW, 1995, J NUCL MED, V36, P1836
[10]   Measuring [18F]FDG uptake in breast cancer during chemotherapy:: comparison of analytical methods [J].
Krak, NC ;
van der Hoeven, JJM ;
Hoekstra, OS ;
Twisk, JWR ;
van der Wall, E ;
Lammertsma, AA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2003, 30 (05) :674-681