A two-factor method for appraising building renovation and energy efficiency improvement projects

被引:68
作者
Martinaitis, Vytautas
Kazakevicius, Eduardas
Vitkauskas, Aloyzas
机构
[1] Cent Project Management Agcy, LT-03109 Vilnius, Lithuania
[2] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
energy efficiency; buildings; project appraisal;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The renovation of residential buildings usually involves a variety of measures aiming at reducing energy and building maintenance bills, increasing safety and market value, and improving comfort and aesthetics. A significant number of project appraisal methods in current use-such as calculations of payback time, net present value, internal rate of return or cost of conserved energy (CCE)-only quantify energy efficiency gains. These approaches are relatively easy to use, but offer a distorted view of complex modernization projects. On the other hand, various methods using multiple criteria take a much wider perspective but are usually time-consuming, based on sometimes uncertain assumptions and require sophisticated tools. A 'two-factor' appraisal method offers a compromise between these two approaches. The main idea of the method is to separate investments into those related to energy efficiency improvements, and those related to building renovation. Costs and benefits of complex measures, which both influence energy consumption and improve building constructions, are separated by using a building rehabilitation coefficient. The CCE is used for the appraisal of energy efficiency investments, while investments in building renovation are appraised using standard tools for the assessment of investments in maintenance, repair and rehabilitation. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 201
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], RILEM REPORT SERIES
[2]   Fundamentals of exergy analysis, entropy generation minimization, and the generation of flow architecture [J].
Bejan, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2002, 26 (07) :545-565
[3]  
Borel L., 1984, THERMODYNAMIQUE ENER
[4]  
BRZESKI JW, 2002, NATL STRATEGY SUSTAI
[5]   Multicriteria approach for the improvement of energy systems design [J].
Giannantoni, C ;
Lazzaretto, A ;
Macor, A ;
Mirandola, A ;
Stoppato, A ;
Tonon, S ;
Ulgiati, S .
ENERGY, 2005, 30 (10) :1989-2016
[6]   Evaluation of the cost efficiency of an energy efficient building [J].
Gieseler, UDJ ;
Heidt, FD ;
Bier, W .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2004, 29 (03) :369-376
[7]   Integrating energy efficiency with the social agenda in sustainability [J].
Goodacre, C ;
Sharples, S ;
Smith, P .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2002, 34 (01) :53-61
[8]  
*GOV REP LITH, 2004, LITH HOUS STRAT
[9]   Design of coordinated energy and environmental policies: use of multi-criteria decision-making [J].
Greening, LA ;
Bernow, S .
ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (06) :721-735
[10]  
Greening LA, 2000, ENERG POLICY, V28, P389, DOI 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00021-5