A three-dimensional biomechanical analysis of sumo and conventional style deadlifts

被引:78
作者
Escamilla, RF
Francisco, AC
Fleisig, GS
Barrentine, SW
Welch, CM
Kayes, AV
Speer, KP
Andrews, JR
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Div Orthopaed Surg, Michael W Krzyzewski Human Performance Lab, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Amer Sports Med Inst, Birmingham, AL 35205 USA
[3] Human Performance Technol Inc, Jupiter, FL 33477 USA
关键词
powerlifting; weightlifting; joint moments; joint moment arms; joint angles; segment angles; kinematics; kinetics; mechanical work;
D O I
10.1097/00005768-200007000-00013
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 [教育学]; 0403 [体育学];
摘要
Purpose: Strength athletes often employ the deadlift in their training or rehabilitation regimens. The purpose of this study was to quantify kinematic and kinetic parameters by employing a three-dimensional analysis during sumo and conventional style deadlifts. Methods: Two 60-Hz video cameras recorded 12 sumo and 12 conventional style lifters during a national powerlifting championship. Parameters were quantified at barbell liftoff (LO), at the instant the barbell passed the knees (KP), and at lift completion. Unpaired t-tests (P < 0.05) were used to compare all parameters. Results: At LO and KP, thigh position was 11-16% more horizontal for the sumo group. whereas the knees and hips extended approximately 12 degrees more for the conventional group. The sumo group had 5-10 degrees greater vertical trunk and thigh positions, employed a wider stance (70 +/- 11 cm vs 32 +/- 8 cm), turned their feet out more (42 +/- 80 vs 14 +/- 6 degrees), and gripped the bar with their hands closer together (47 +/- 4 cm vs 55 +/- 10 cm). Vertical bar distance, mechanical work. and predicted energy expenditure were approximately 25-40% greater in the conventional group. Hip extensor, knee extensor, and ankle dorsiflexor moments were generated for the sumo group. whereas hip extensor, knee extensor, knee flexor, and ankle plantar flexor moments were generated for the conventional group. Ankle and knee moments and moment arms were significantly different between the sumo and conventional groups, whereas hip moments and moments arms did not show any significantly differences. Three-dimensional calculations were more accurate and significantly different than two-dimensional calculations, especially for the sumo deadlift. Conclusions: Biomechanical differences between sumo and conventional deadlifts result from technique variations between these exercises. Understanding these differences will aid the strength coach or rehabilitation specialist in determining which deadlift style an athlete or patient should employ.
引用
收藏
页码:1265 / 1275
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]
American College of Sports Medicine, 1991, GUID EX TEST PRESCR, P285
[2]
BROWN EW, 1985, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V17, P554
[3]
Prediction of the oxygen cost of the deadlift exercise [J].
Brown, Stanley P. ;
Clemons, James M. ;
He, Qin ;
Liu, Su .
JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 1994, 12 (04) :371-375
[4]
CHOLEWICKI J, 1991, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, V23, P1179
[5]
LUMBAR POSTERIOR LIGAMENT INVOLVEMENT DURING EXTREMELY HEAVY LIFTS ESTIMATED FROM FLUOROSCOPIC MEASUREMENTS [J].
CHOLEWICKI, J ;
MCGILL, SM .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1992, 25 (01) :17-28
[6]
Dempster WT, 1955, SPACE REQUIREMENTS S, P55
[7]
ELLIOTT BC, 1989, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V21, P450
[8]
THE LOADS ON THE LUMBAR SPINE DURING EXTREME WEIGHT LIFTING [J].
GRANHED, H ;
JONSON, R ;
HANSSON, T .
SPINE, 1987, 12 (02) :146-149
[9]
INTRA-ABDOMINAL AND INTRA-THORACIC PRESSURES DURING LIFTING AND JUMPING [J].
HARMAN, EA ;
FRYKMAN, PN ;
CLAGETT, ER ;
KRAEMER, WJ .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1988, 20 (02) :195-201
[10]
HARMAN EA, 1989, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V21, P186