Can class analysis be salvaged?

被引:204
作者
Grusky, DB
Sorensen, JB
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Sociol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/231351
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
The ongoing retreat from class analysis can be attributed to the declining appeal of aggregate representations of class coupled with the virtual absence of any disaggregate alternatives. When local solidarities are ignored, the weakness of conventional aggregate models is easily misinterpreted as evidence of generic destructuration, and standard postmodernist formulations are accordingly difficult to resist. Although local structuration is often regarded as sociologically trivial, the available evidence suggests that such class analytic processes as closure, exploitation, and collective action emerge more clearly at the level of disaggregate occupations than conventional aggregate classes.
引用
收藏
页码:1187 / 1234
页数:48
相关论文
共 242 条
  • [1] THE NEW OCCUPATIONAL STRUCTURE - WHAT ARE THE QUESTIONS
    ABBOTT, A
    [J]. WORK AND OCCUPATIONS, 1989, 16 (03) : 273 - 291
  • [2] Abbott Andrew., 2014, SYSTEM PROFESSIONS E
  • [3] Abercrombie N., 1983, CAPITAL LABOUR MIDDL
  • [4] Amin Ash., 1994, POSTFORDISM READER, P1, DOI DOI 10.1002/
  • [5] [Anonymous], MARXISM TODAY OCT
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1850, RED REPUBLICAN
  • [7] [Anonymous], NATURE WORK SOCIOLOG
  • [8] [Anonymous], 1973, COMING POST IND SOC
  • [9] [Anonymous], 1988, Social Class in Modern Britain
  • [10] [Anonymous], DIVIDED SOC CLASS ST