What produces television attention and attention style? Genre, situation, and individual differences as predictors

被引:22
作者
Hawkins, RP
Pingree, S
Hitchon, J
Radler, B
Gorham, BW
Kahlor, L
Gilligan, E
Serlin, RC
Schmidt, T
Kannaovakun, P
Kolbeins, GH
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Journalism & Mass Commun, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Syracuse Univ, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
[3] Univ Texas, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[4] Prince Songkla Univ, Songkhla, Thailand
[5] Univ Iceland, IS-101 Reykjavik, Iceland
关键词
D O I
10.1093/hcr/31.1.162
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Individual looks at television vary enormously in length, and this has previously indicated differences in ongoing cognitive processes. Furthermore, the relative frequency of looks of different lengths may indicate styles of attention to television. This article compares visual attention of 152 subjects across a variety of genres and examines differences located by situation, person, and media perception variables. Attention style was not consistent for individuals but varied for different types of programming and between-program breaks. Situational, person, and media belief variables did not predict the proportions of four types of looks. They did, however, predict differences in the proportion of moderately short (orienting) looks across types of content, but not the previously more important very short (monitoring) or moderately long (engaged) looks. The overall importance of type of content in these results suggests that further research should examine within-program differences in message construction and assess attentional style as patterns or sequences of looks.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 187
页数:26
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Alwitt Linda F., 1980, HUMAN COMMUNICATION, V7, P52, DOI [10.1111/j.1468-2958.1980.tb00550.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1468-2958.1980.TB00550.X]
[2]  
Anderson D.R., 1983, CHILDRENS UNDERSTAND, P1
[3]  
Anderson DanielR., 1991, RESPONDING SCREEN RE, P3
[4]  
ANDERSON DR, 1976, CHILD DEV, V47, P806
[5]  
ANDERSON DR, 1987, CHILD DEV, V58, P798, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1987.tb01420.x
[6]   Background television and reading memory in context -: Assessing TV interference and facilitative context effects on encoding versus retrieval processes [J].
Armstrong, GB ;
Chung, L .
COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2000, 27 (03) :327-352
[7]   ATTENTIONAL INERTIA AND RECOGNITION MEMORY IN ADULT TELEVISION VIEWING [J].
BURNS, JJ ;
ANDERSON, DR .
COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 1993, 20 (06) :777-799
[8]   THE NEED FOR COGNITION [J].
CACIOPPO, JT ;
PETTY, RE .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 42 (01) :116-131
[9]   A TEMPORAL ANALYSIS OF FREE TOY PLAY AND DISTRACTIBILITY IN YOUNG-CHILDREN [J].
CHOI, HP ;
ANDERSON, DR .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 52 (01) :41-69
[10]   Do children learn how to watch television?: The impact of extensive experience with Blue's Clues on preschool children's television viewing behavior [J].
Crawley, AM ;
Anderson, DR ;
Santomero, A ;
Wilder, A ;
Williams, M ;
Evans, MK ;
Bryant, J .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2002, 52 (02) :264-280