Omission bias and vaccine rejection by parents of healthy children: Implications for the influenza A/H1N1 vaccination programme

被引:80
作者
Brown, Katrina F. [1 ]
Kroll, J. Simon [1 ]
Hudson, Michael J. [2 ]
Ramsay, Mary [3 ]
Green, John [4 ]
Vincent, Charles A. [1 ]
Fraser, Graham [5 ]
Sevdalis, Nick [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, London W2 1PG, England
[2] Hlth Protect Agcy Ctr Emergency Preparedness & Re, Salisbury SP4 0JG, Wilts, England
[3] Hlth Protect Agcy Ctr Infect, London NW9 5EQ, England
[4] Cent & NW London NHS Fdn Trust, London NW1 7QY, England
[5] Hlth Protect Agcy Reg Epidemiol Unit London, London WC1V 7PP, England
关键词
H1N1; vaccine; Vaccine decision-making; Omission bias; PERTUSSIS VACCINATION; MMR VACCINATION; SWINE FLU; IMMUNIZATION; DECISIONS; BELIEFS; RUBELLA; MEASLES; MUMPS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.04.012
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
2009 Hi NI influenza A ("swine flu") vaccine has been offered to healthy UK children aged 6 months-5 years since December 2009, though around 50% of parents plan to reject the vaccine. This study examined whether such parents exhibit omission bias (preference for errors arising from inaction over errors arising from action). One-hundred and forty-two parents completed an online questionnaire in which they rated (a) probability of occurrence, (b) symptoms and (c) duration of a hypothetical disease and a hypothetical vaccine adverse event (VAE). Almost all attributes were rated significantly less favourably when relating to VAE than to disease (p < 0.01 for 17 of 22 outcomes), despite the attributes being objectively identical. These data suggest that any vaccine is at a disadvantage in many parents' consciousness in comparison with the infection itself, and that minor safety concerns could have disproportionately detrimental effects on vaccine uptake. Behavioural science offers strategies to ameliorate the impact of this bias and these should be explored further. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4181 / 4185
页数:5
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2009, Lancet, V374, P358, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61394-5
  • [2] OMISSION BIAS AND PERTUSSIS VACCINATION
    ASCH, DA
    BARON, J
    HERSHEY, JC
    KUNREUTHER, H
    MESZAROS, J
    RITOV, I
    SPRANCA, M
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1994, 14 (02) : 118 - 123
  • [3] Are parental vaccine safety concerns associated with receipt of measles-mumps-rubella, diphtheria and tetanus toxoids with acellular pertussis, or hepatitis B vaccines by children?
    Bardenheier, B
    Yusuf, H
    Schwartz, B
    Gust, D
    Barker, L
    Rodewald, L
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, 2004, 158 (06): : 569 - 575
  • [4] REFERENCE POINTS AND OMISSION BIAS
    BARON, J
    RITOV, I
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1994, 59 (03) : 475 - 498
  • [6] BOSELEY S, 2009, GUARDIAN 0824
  • [7] BOSELEY S, GUARDIAN 0901
  • [8] BOWCOTT O, 2009, GUARDIAN 0818
  • [9] BROWN KF, 2010, VACCINE IN PRESS
  • [10] The MMR vaccination and autism controversy in United Kingdom 1998-2005: Inevitable community outrage or a failure of risk communication?
    Burgess, David C.
    Burgess, Margaret A.
    Leask, Julie
    [J]. VACCINE, 2006, 24 (18) : 3921 - 3928