Identification of technological knowledge intermediaries

被引:65
作者
Lim, Hyojeong [2 ]
Park, Yongtae [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Seoul 151711, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Technol Management Econ & Policy Program, Seoul 151711, South Korea
关键词
Technological knowledge intermediary; Industry affiliation; Patent co-classification; Network analysis; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; INNOVATIONS; SPILLOVERS; CENTRALITY; POSITIONS; BROKERAGE; PATENTS; TAIWAN; FLOWS; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-009-0133-8
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Intermediaries in a technological knowledge network have recently been highlighted as crucial innovation drivers that accelerate technological knowledge flows. Although the patent network analysis has been frequently used to monitor technological knowledge structures, it has examined only sources or recipients of the technological knowledge by mainly estimating technological knowledge inflows or outflows of a network node. This study, therefore, aims to identify technological knowledge intermediaries when a technology-level knowledge network is composed of several industries. First, types of technological knowledge flows are deductively classified into four types by highlighting industry affiliations of source technologies and recipient technologies. Second, a directed technological knowledge network is generated at the technology class level, using patent co-classification analysis. Third, for each class, mediating scores are measured according to the four types. The empirical analysis illustrates the Korea's technological knowledge network between 2000 and 2008. As a result, the four types of mediating scores are compared between industries, and industry-wise technological knowledge intermediaries are identified. The proposed approach is practical to explore converging processes in technology development where technology classes act as technological knowledge intermediaries among diverse industries.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 561
页数:19
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1982, Social Structure and Network Analysis
[2]   Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys [J].
Archibugi, D ;
Pianta, M .
TECHNOVATION, 1996, 16 (09) :451-468
[3]   What percentage of innovations are patented? empirical estimates for European firms [J].
Arundel, A ;
Kabla, I .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1998, 27 (02) :127-141
[4]  
Basberg B., 1984, World Patent Information, V6, P158
[5]  
Bavelas A, 1948, APPL ANTHROPOL, V7, pA16
[6]   Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification [J].
Breschi, S ;
Lissoni, F ;
Malerba, F .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2003, 32 (01) :69-87
[7]   Structural holes and good ideas [J].
Burt, RS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2004, 110 (02) :349-399
[8]   POSITIONS IN NETWORKS [J].
BURT, RS .
SOCIAL FORCES, 1976, 55 (01) :93-122
[9]   Core technologies and key industries in Taiwan from 1978 to 2002: A perspective from patent analysis [J].
Chen, DZ ;
Chang, HW ;
Huang, MH ;
Fu, FC .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2005, 64 (01) :31-53
[10]   A PATENT-BASED CARTOGRAPHY OF TECHNOLOGY [J].
ENGELSMAN, EC ;
VANRAAN, AFJ .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1994, 23 (01) :1-26