Updating to the WAIS-III and WMS-III: Considerations for research and clinical practice

被引:45
作者
Tulsky, DS
Ledbetter, MF
机构
[1] Psychol Corp, San Antonio, TX USA
[2] Trin Clin Associates, San Antonio, TX USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037//1040-3590.12.3.253
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R) and the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R) are the most commonly used intelligence and memory scales in both clinical and neuropsychology. In 1997, updated versions of these instruments (the WAIS-III and WMS-III) were published. Because of the extensive use of the WAIS-R and WMS-R in the field and the body of accumulated research, there is naturally some reluctance by clinicians and researchers to update to the new versions. It is sometimes difficult for clinicians who test individuals on repeated occasions to switch over to the new versions of the scales because of the difficulty of interpreting score discrepancy between the 2 versions. Researchers, especially those conducting longitudinal research, have a similar difficulty in changing measurement devices because of the possible threat to internal validity. This article reviews the substantive revisions of the scales and outlines those issues that users should take into consideration when updating to the new versions.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 262
页数:10
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
American Educational Research Association. American Psychological Association & N. C. on M. in E., 1999, STAND ED PSYCH TEST
[2]  
[Anonymous], LEARNING INDIVIDUAL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1986, Technical manual for the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1939, MEASUREMENT ADULT IN, DOI DOI 10.1037/10020-001
[5]  
[Anonymous], IQ TRIARCHIC THEORY
[6]   A DEMOGRAPHICALLY BASED INDEX OF PREMORBID INTELLIGENCE FOR THE WAIS-R [J].
BARONA, A ;
REYNOLDS, CR ;
CHASTAIN, R .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 52 (05) :885-887
[7]  
BORNSTEIN RA, 1989, PSYCHOL ASSESSMENT J, V1, P203
[8]   Revising psychological tests: Lessons learned from the revision of the MMPI [J].
Butcher, JN .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2000, 12 (03) :263-271
[9]  
Butters N., 1988, CLIN NEUROPSYCHOL, V2, P133
[10]  
CARROLL J. B, 1993, Human cognitive abilities: a survey of factor-analytic studies, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511571312