Developing and Testing an Integrative Framework for Open Government Adoption in Local Governments

被引:158
作者
Grimmelikhuijsen, Stephan G. [1 ]
Feeney, Mary K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Sch Governance, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Arizona State Univ, Eth Publ Affairs, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
SOCIAL MEDIA USE; INNOVATION TYPES; POLICY-MAKING; TRANSPARENCY; DIFFUSION;
D O I
10.1111/puar.12689
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Open government is an important innovation to foster trustworthy and inclusive governments. The authors develop and test an integrative theoretical framework drawing from theories on policy diffusion and innovation adoption. Based on this, they investigate how structural, cultural, and environmental variables explain three dimensions of open government: accessibility, transparency, and participation. The framework is tested by combining 2014 survey data and observational data from 500 local U.S. government websites. Organizational structure, including technological and organizational capacity, is a determinant shared by all dimensions of open government. Furthermore, accessibility is affected by a mixture of an innovative and participative culture and external pressures. A flexible and innovative culture positively relates to higher levels of transparency, whereas capacity is a strong predictor of adopting participatory features. The main conclusion is that there is no one-size-fits-all solution to fostering the three dimensions of open government, as each dimension is subject to a unique combination of determinants.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 590
页数:12
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Reengineering the open government concept: An empirical support for a proposed model [J].
Abu-Shanab, Emad A. .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2015, 32 (04) :453-463
[2]  
Barber B., 1984, STRONG DEMOCRACY
[3]   Can You Find It on the Web? An Assessment of Municipal E-Government Transparency [J].
Bearfield, Domonic A. ;
Bowman, Ann O'M. .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2017, 47 (02) :172-188
[4]   Competing for Transparency: Political Competition and Institutional Reform in Mexican States [J].
Berliner, Daniel ;
Erlich, Aaron .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2015, 109 (01) :110-128
[5]  
Berry F.S., 2007, Theories of the policy process, V2, P223, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780367274689-8
[6]   STATE LOTTERY ADOPTIONS AS POLICY INNOVATIONS - AN EVENT HISTORY ANALYSIS [J].
BERRY, FS ;
BERRY, WD .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1990, 84 (02) :395-415
[7]   Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies [J].
Bertot, John C. ;
Jaeger, Paul T. ;
Grimes, Justin M. .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2010, 27 (03) :264-271
[8]   Designing Public Participation Processes [J].
Bryson, John M. ;
Quick, Kathryn S. ;
Slotterback, Carissa Schively ;
Crosby, Barbara C. .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2013, 73 (01) :23-34
[9]   Transparency for Trust in Government: How Effective is Formal Transparency? [J].
Cucciniello, Maria ;
Nasi, Greta .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2014, 37 (13) :911-921
[10]  
DAMANPOUR F, 1991, ACAD MANAGE J, V34, P555, DOI 10.5465/256406