Optimizing the number of electrodes with high-rate stimulation of the clarion CII cochlear implant

被引:41
作者
Frijns, JHM [1 ]
Klop, WMC [1 ]
Bonnet, RM [1 ]
Briaire, JJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, ENT Dept, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
cochlear implant; phoneme recognition threshold; pulse rate; speech perception in noise; speech reception threshold;
D O I
10.1080/0036554021000028126
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective-This blind crossover study evaluates the effect of the number of electrodes of the Clarion CII cochlear implant on speech perception in silence and in noise using a "high-rate" continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) strategy. Material and Methods-Nine users of this implant with 3-11 months of experience of an 8-channel CIS strategy [833 pulses per second (pps)/channel, 75 mus/phase] were fitted in a random order with 8-, 12- and 16-channel CIS strategies (+/-1400 pps/channel, 21 mus/phase). After I month of exclusive use of each strategy the performance was tested with consonant-vowel-consonant words in silence (sound only) and in speech-shaped background noise with signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of + 10, + 5, 0 and - 5 dB. Results-With "high-rate" strategies most patients' speech understanding in noise improved, although the optimum number of electrodes was highly variable. Generally, faster performers benefited from more active electrodes, whilst slower performers deteriorated. If each patient's optimal strategy was determined by a weighted sum of the test results at + 10, + 5 and 0 dB SNR, the average phoneme score improved from 57% to 72% at a SNR of + 5 dB, and from 46% to 56% at a SNR of 0 dB. The average phoneme score in silence was approximate to 85% for all strategies. Conclusion-We conclude that speech perception (especially in noise) can improve significantly with "high-rate" speech processing strategies, provided that the optimum number of electrodes is determined for each patient individually.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 142
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
BRIAIRE JJ, UNPUB FITTING STRATE
[2]   Effects of the number of channels and speech-to-noise ratio on rate of connected discourse tracking through a simulated cochlear implant speech processor [J].
Faulkner, A ;
Rosen, S ;
Wilkinson, L .
EAR AND HEARING, 2001, 22 (05) :431-438
[3]   Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor [J].
Fishman, KE ;
Shannon, RV ;
Slattery, WH .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1997, 40 (05) :1201-1215
[4]   Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: Comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants [J].
Friesen, LM ;
Shannon, RV ;
Baskent, D ;
Wang, X .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2001, 110 (02) :1150-1163
[5]   Initial evaluation of the Clarion CII cochlear implant: Speech perception and neural response imaging [J].
Frijns, JHM ;
Briaire, JJ ;
de Laat, JAPM ;
Grote, JJ .
EAR AND HEARING, 2002, 23 (03) :184-197
[6]   The importance of human cochlear anatomy for the results of modiolus-hugging multichannel cochlear implants [J].
Frijns, JHM ;
Briaire, JJ ;
Grote, JJ .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2001, 22 (03) :340-349
[7]   Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: Acoustic and electric hearing [J].
Fu, QJ ;
Shannon, RV ;
Wang, XS .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1998, 104 (06) :3586-3596
[8]   Effect of stimulation rate on phoneme recognition by Nucleus-22 cochlear implant listeners [J].
Fu, QJ ;
Shannon, RV .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2000, 107 (01) :589-597
[9]  
KIEFER J, 1999, COCHLEAR IMPLANTS
[10]  
Kirk KI, 2000, COCHLEAR IMPLANTS, P225